The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contrasting effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and temperature on Rubisco activity, chlorophyll fluorescence, needle ultrastructure and secondary metabolites in conifer seedlings
Open accessAbstract
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings were grown for 50 days in growth chambers in an ambient or twice ambient carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) at a day/night temperature of 19/12 degrees C or 23/16 degrees C. Although elevated [CO2] (EC) had only slight effects on the growth parameters measured, elevated temperature (ET) increased above ground dry mass of both species. Among treatments, biomass accumulation of both species was greatest in the combined EC + ET treatment. The EC treatment induced thylakoid swelling and increased numbers of plastoglobuli observed in Scots pine needles. Although EC had little effect on Rubisco protein or N concentration of needles, ET had a large effect on N-containing compounds and enhanced N allocation from 1-year-old needles. Terpenoids were more responsive to EC and ET than total phenolics. Generally, terpene concentrations were reduced by EC and increased by ET. Increased terpenoid concentrations in response to ET might be associated with thermotolerance of photosynthesis. In Norway spruce, EC decreased total phenolic concentrations in needles, probably as a result of increased growth. We conclude that, in seedlings of these boreal species, the effects of elevated [CO2] on the studied parameters were small compared with the effects of elevated temperature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STITT, M., & KRAPP, A. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00386.x · Cited by 1,044
Interactions between increasing CO2 concentration and temperature on plant growth
MORISON, J. I. L., & LAWLOR, D. W. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00443.x · Cited by 509
Cited by
Yeshi, K., Crayn, D., Ritmejerytė, E., & Wangchuk, P. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27010313 · Cited by 488
Austin, J. R., Frost, E., Vidi, P.-A., Kessler, F., & Staehelin, L. A. (2006) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.105.039859 · Cited by 466
Jamieson, M. A., Trowbridge, A. M., Raffa, K. F., & Lindroth, R. L. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.206524 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Sallas, L., Luomala, E.-M., Utriainen, J., Kainulainen, P., & Holopainen, J. K.
- Venue
- Tree Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-02-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-108
- ISSN
- 0829-318X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-4469
- OpenAlex
- W2317887394
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contrasting effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and temperature on Rubisco activity, chlorophyll fluorescence, needle ultrastructure and secondary metabolites in conifer seedlings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/treephys/23.2.97
- The paper
- Sallas, L., Luomala, E.-M., Utriainen, J., Kainulainen, P., & Holopainen, J. K. (2003). Contrasting effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and temperature on Rubisco activity, chlorophyll fluorescence, needle ultrastructure and secondary metabolites in conifer seedlings. Tree Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/23.2.97
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.