Cited by 38Neonatal Respiratory Health ResearchInfant Development and Preterm CareRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Effect of Treatment of Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Using Low-cost Bubble CPAP in a Rural African Hospital

Myhre, Jennifer, Immaculate, Mutisya, Okeyo, Bob, Anand, Matthew, Omoding, Anastacia, Myhre, Luke, Okeyo, Lilian, Barasa, Immaculate +1 more·2016·Journal of Tropical Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Kenya's neonatal mortality rate remains unacceptably high, at 22 deaths per 1000 live births, with a third of those attributable to prematurity. Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the single most important cause of morbidity and mortality in the premature neonate. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a proven modality of therapy but is rarely used in low-resource settings. We report on the introduction of bubble CPAP (BCPAP), a low-cost method of delivering CPAP appropriate to our setting, by comparing survival-to-discharge before and after the technology was introduced. METHODS: The inpatient hospital records of all preterm infants (<37 weeks) diagnosed with RDS in the AIC Kijabe Hospital Nursery during two 18-month periods before and after the introduction of BCPAP (46 infants enrolled from 1 November 2007 to 30 April 2009 vs. 72 infants enrolled from 1 November 2009 to 30 April 2011) were reviewed. Differences in survival-to-discharge rates between the two time periods were analyzed. RESULTS: The survival-to-discharge rate was higher in Period 2 (after the introduction of BCPAP) than in Period 1 (pre-BCPAP) (85% vs. 61%, p = 0.007). Similarly, there were lower referral rates of preterm infants with RDS in Period 2 than Period 1 (4% vs. 17%, p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: BCPAP has contributed significantly to favorable outcomes for preterm infants with RDS at AIC Kijabe Hospital. The use of this simple technology should be considered and studied for expansion to all hospitals in Kenya that care for preterm infants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/tropej/fmw023

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myhre, J., Immaculate, M., Okeyo, B., Anand, M., Omoding, A., Myhre, L., Okeyo, L., Barasa, I., & Letchford, S.
Affiliations
Kijabe Hospital (KE)
Venue
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Published
2016-04-25
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
385-389
ISSN
  • 0142-6338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3664
OpenAlex
W2343205110
Cited by
38
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Tropical Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
bubble CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure, respiratory distress syndrome, preterm infants, neonatal survival, resource-limited settings, neonatal mortality, rural hospitals
MeSH terms
Female, Hospitals, Rural, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Kenya, Male, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Retrospective Studies, Rural Population, Survival Rate, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review