The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions
Open accessAbstract
This article introduces a large new cross‐country database, the Database of Political Institutions. It covers 177 countries over 21 years, 1975–95. The article presents the intuition, construction, and definitions of the different variables. Among the novel variables introduced are several measures of checks and balances, tenure and stability, identification of party affiliation with government or opposition, and fragmentation of opposition and government parties in the legislature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Politics of Authoritarian Rule
Svolik, M. W. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139176040 · Cited by 2,611
The resource curse revisited and revised: A tale of paradoxes and red herrings
Brunnschweiler, C. N., & Bulte, E. H. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.08.004 · Cited by 1,121
A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007
Boix, C., Miller, M., & Rosato, S. (2013) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414012463905 · Cited by 1,072
The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes
Gerschewski, J. (2013) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2013.738860 · Cited by 1,053
Determinants of generalized trust: a cross-country comparison
Bjørnskov, C. (2007) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-006-9069-1 · Cited by 969
Metadata
- Authors
- Beck, T.
- Venue
- The World Bank Economic Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-06-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 165-176
- ISSN
- 0258-6770 (ISSN-L)
- 1564-698X
- OpenAlex
- W2110537446
- Cited by
- 2,798
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 152.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/wber/15.1.165
- The paper
- Beck, T. (2001). New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. The World Bank Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/15.1.165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
