Cited by 969Social Capital and NetworksCulture, Economy, and Development StudiesCorruption and Economic Development

Determinants of generalized trust: a cross-country comparison

Bjørnskov, Christian·2007·Public Choice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11127-006-9069-1

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bjørnskov, C.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Bjørnskov, Christian
Venue
Public Choice
Published
2006-09-15
Volume
130
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 0048-5829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7101
OpenAlex
W2100726744
Cited by
969
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 42
FWCI
44.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Choice (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
Keywords
generalized trust, determinants of trust, social polarization, income inequality, ethnic diversity, Protestantism, monarchy, post-communist societies, cross-national comparison, trust measurement, endogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review