The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making Conditional Cash Transfer Programs More Efficient: Designing for Maximum Effect of the Conditionality
Open accessAbstract
Conditional cash transfer programs are now used extensively to encourage poor parents to increase investments in their children’s human capital. These programs can be large and expensive, motivating a quest for greater efficiency through increased impact of the programs’ imposed conditions on human capital formation. This requires designing the programs’ targeting and calibration rules specifically to achieve this result. Using data from the Progresa randomized experiment in Mexico, this article shows that large efficiency gains can be achieved by taking into account how much the probability of a child’s enrollment is affected by a conditional transfer. Rules for targeting and calibration can be made easy to implement by selecting indicators that are simple, observable, and verifiable and that cannot be manipulated by beneficiaries. The Mexico case shows that these efficiency gains can be achieved without increasing inequality among poor households.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gertler, P. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828041302109 · Cited by 703
Cited by
Engle, P. L., Fernald, L. C., Alderman, H., Behrman, J., O'Gara, C., Yousafzai, A., de Mello, M. C., Hidrobo, M., Ulkuer, N., Ertem, I., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60889-1 · Cited by 995
Cash or Condition? Evidence from a Cash Transfer Experiment
Baird, S., McIntosh, C., & Ozler, B. (2011) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjr032 · Cited by 834
Lagarde, M., Haines, A., & Palmer, N. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.16.1900 · Cited by 668
Fernald, L. C., Gertler, P. J., & Neufeld, L. M. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60382-7 · Cited by 596
Baird, S., Ferreira, F. H. G., Özler, B., & Woolcock, M. (2013) · Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World · doi:10.4073/csr.2013.8 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E.
- Venue
- The World Bank Economic Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-29
- ISSN
- 0258-6770 (ISSN-L)
- 1564-698X
- OpenAlex
- W2123197550
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 59.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making Conditional Cash Transfer Programs More Efficient: Designing for Maximum Effect of the Conditionality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/wber/lhj002
- The paper
- de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2006). Making Conditional Cash Transfer Programs More Efficient: Designing for Maximum Effect of the Conditionality. The World Bank Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhj002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.