Cited by 143Fire effects on ecosystemsForest Management and PolicyRangeland and Wildlife Management

Estimating Suppression Expenditures for Individual Large Wildland Fires

Gebert, Krista M., Calkin, David E., Yoder, Jonathan·2007·Western Journal of Applied Forestry

Abstract

The extreme cost of fighting wildland fires has brought fire suppression expenditures to the forefront of budgetary and policy debate in the United States. Inasmuch as large fires are responsible for the bulk of fire suppression expenditures, understanding fire characteristics that influence expenditures is important for both strategic fire planning and onsite fire management decisions. These characteristics then can be used to produce estimates of suppression expenditures for large wildland fires for use in wildland fire decision support or after-fire reviews. The primary objective of this research was to develop regression models that could be used to estimate expenditures on large wildland fires based on area burned, variables representing the fire environment, values at risk, resource availability, detection time, and National Forest System region. Variables having the largest influence on cost included fire intensity level, area burned, and total housing value within 20 mi of ignition. These equations were then used to predict suppression expenditures on a set of fiscal year 2005 Forest Service fires for the purpose of detecting “extreme” cost fires—those fires falling more than 1 or 2 SDs above or below their expected value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/wjaf/22.3.188

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite vigorous fire suppression near human communities, the number of homes destroyed by wildfire continues on an upward trend.

    “Despite the vigorous fire suppression near human communities (Gebert et al. 2007;Liang et al. 2008;Gude et al. 2013) the number of homes destroyed by wildfire continues on an upward trend.”

    From Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management (2015) · cites this paper as Gebert et al. 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gebert, K. M., Calkin, D. E., & Yoder, J.
Affiliations
  • Rocky Mountain Research Station (US)
  • Washington State University (US)
Venue
Western Journal of Applied Forestry
Published
2007-07-01
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
188-196
ISSN
  • 0885-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3770
OpenAlex
W2103186690
Cited by
143
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Western Journal of Applied Forestry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
cost estimation, fire intensity, burned area, fire detection time, resource availability, National Forest System, forest services, fire management decision support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review