Cited by 156Fire effects on ecosystemsForest Management and PolicyRangeland and Wildlife Management

Modeling Containment of Large Wildfires Using Generalized Linear Mixed-Model Analysis

Finney, Mark, Grenfell, Isaac C., McHugh, Charles W.·2009·Forest Science

Abstract

Billions of dollars are spent annually in the United States to contain large wildland fires, but the factors contributing to suppression success remain poorly understood. We used a regression model (generalized linear mixed-model) to model containment probability of individual fires, assuming that containment was a repeated-measures problem (fixed effect) and individual fires were random effects. Changes in daily fire size from 306 fires occurring in years 2001–2005 were processed to identify intervals of high spread from those of low spread. The model was tested against independent data from 140 fires in 2006. The analysis suggested that containment was positively related to the number of consecutive days during which the fire grew little and the number of previous intervals. Containment probability was negatively related to the length of intervals during which the fire exhibited high spread and the presence of timber fuel types, but fire size was not a significant predictor. Characterization of containment probability may be a useful component of cost-benefit analysis of large fire management and planning systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/forestscience/55.3.249

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In other regions or ecosystems, such as parts of North America, land-use change and a culture of aggressive fire suppression may limit fire activity.

    “Conversely, in other regions or ecosystems of the world, such as in parts of North America, land-use change and a culture of aggressive fire suppression may limit fire activity (Cumming 2005, Finney et al 2009).”

    From The spatially varying influence of humans on fire probability in North America (2016) · cites this paper as Finney et al 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. FLOWERS, P.J., T. P. HUNTER, AND T. J. MILLS. 1983. Design of a model to simulate large-fire suppression effectiveness. P. 168 -173 in Proc. 7th Conf. on Fire and Forest Meteorology. American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA.
  2. HOSMER, D.W., AND S. LEMESHOW. 2000. Applied logistic regres- sion. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, p. 160 -164.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finney, M., Grenfell, I. C., & McHugh, C. W.
Affiliations
US Forest Service (US)
Venue
Forest Science
Published
2009-06-01
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
249-255
ISSN
  • 0015-749X (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3738
OpenAlex
W2150967911
Cited by
156
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Forest Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
wildfire suppression, fire spread rate, fire size, fire management planning, cost-benefit analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review