The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Majority of the Type III Effector Inventory of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 Can Suppress Plant Immunity
Open accessAbstract
The Pseudomonas syringae type III protein secretion system (T3SS) and the type III effectors it injects into plant cells are required for plant pathogenicity and the ability to elicit a hypersensitive response (HR). The HR is a programmed cell death that is associated with effector-triggered immunity (ETI). A primary function of P. syringae type III effectors appears to be the suppression of ETI and pathogen-associated molecular pattern–triggered immunity (PTI), which is induced by conserved molecules on microorganisms. We reported that seven type III effectors from P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 were capable of suppressing an HR induced by P. fluorescens(pHIR11) and have now tested 35 DC3000 type III effectors in this assay, finding that the majority of them can suppress the HR induced by HopA1. One newly identified type III effector with particularly strong HR suppression activity was HopS2. We used the pHIR11 derivative pLN1965, which lacks hopA1, in related assays and found that a subset of the type III effectors that suppressed HopA1-induced ETI also suppressed an ETI response induced by AvrRpm1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. A. thaliana plants expressing either HopAO1 or HopF2, two type III effectors that suppressed the HopA1-induced HR, were reduced in the flagellin-induced PTI response as well as PTI induced by other PAMPs and allowed enhanced in planta growth of P. syringae. Collectively, our results suggest that the majority of DC3000 type III effectors can suppress plant immunity. Additionally, the construct pLN1965 will likely be a useful tool in determining whether other type III effectors or effectors from other types of pathogens can suppress either ETI, PTI, or both.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05286 · Cited by 13,177
Host-Microbe Interactions: Shaping the Evolution of the Plant Immune Response
Chisholm, S. T., Coaker, G., Day, B., & Staskawicz, B. J. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008 · Cited by 2,957
Cited by
Programmed cell death in the plant immune system
Coll, N. S., Epple, P., & Dangl, J. L. (2011) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2011.37 · Cited by 915
Toruño, T. Y., Stergiopoulos, I., & Coaker, G. (2016) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-100204 · Cited by 665
Induced Systemic Resistance for Improving Plant Immunity by Beneficial Microbes
Yu, Y., Gui, Y., Li, Z., Jiang, C., Guo, J., & Niu, D. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11030386 · Cited by 570
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, M., Tian, F., Wamboldt, Y., & Alfano, J. R.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1069-1080
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W2019854769
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.