The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of a S alicylic A cid-I nsensitive Mutant (sai1) of Arabidopsis thaliana, Identified in a Selective Screen Utilizing the SA-Inducible Expression of the tms2 Gene
Open accessAbstract
Salicylic acid (SA) plays an important signaling role in the resistance of many plants to pathogen invasion. Increases in endogenous SA levels have been associated with the hypersensitive response as well as systemic acquired resistance (SAR). SA also induces the expression of a subset of the pathogenesis-related (PR) genes. However, relatively little is known about the events occurring subsequent to SA accumulation during a resistance response. In order to identify mutations in components of the SA signal transduction pathway, we have developed a genetic screen in Arabidopsis thaliana that utilizes the Agrobacterium tumefaciens tms2 gene as a counter-selectable marker. SA-inducible expression of the tms2 gene from the tobacco PR-1a promoter confers sensitivity to α-naphthalene acetamide (α-NAM), resulting in inhibition of root growth in germinating transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings. Mutants in which root growth is insensitive to α-NAM have been selected from this PR-1a:tms2 transgenic line with the expectation that a subset will lack a regulatory component downstream of SA. The sai1 mutant so identified expressed neither the PR-1a:tms2 transgene nor the endogenous Arabidopsis PR-1, PR-2, and PR-5 genes in response to SA. These genes also were not induced in sai1 by 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA) or benzothiadiazole (BTH), two chemical inducers of SAR. As expected of a mutation acting downstream of SA, sai1 plants accumulate SA and its glucoside in response to infection with an avirulent pathogen and are more susceptible to this avirulent pathogen than the wild-type parent. sai1 is allelic to npr1, a previously identified SA-noninducible mutation. The recessive nature of the noninducible sai1 mutation suggests that the wild-type SAI1 gene acts as a positive regulator in the SA signal transduction pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Contrasting Mechanisms of Defense Against Biotrophic and Necrotrophic Pathogens
Glazebrook, J. (2005) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135923 · Cited by 4,367
Durrant, W. E., & Dong, X. (2004) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421 · Cited by 3,184
SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE INDUCED BY RHIZOSPHERE BACTERIA
van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (1998) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453 · Cited by 2,361
Priming: Getting Ready for Battle
Conrath, U., Beckers, G. J. M., Flors, V., García-Agustín, P., Jakab, G., Mauch, F., Newman, M.-A., Pieterse, C. M. J., Poinssot, B., Pozo, M. J., et al. (2006) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-19-1062 · Cited by 1,532
Systemic Acquired Resistance: Turning Local Infection into Global Defense
Fu, Z. Q., & Dong, X. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105606 · Cited by 1,524
Metadata
- Authors
- Shah, J., Tsui, F., & Klessig, D. F.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-78
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W2109210300
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of a S alicylic A cid-I nsensitive Mutant (sai1) of Arabidopsis thaliana, Identified in a Selective Screen Utilizing the SA-Inducible Expression of the tms2 Gene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi.1997.10.1.69
- The paper
- Shah, J., Tsui, F., & Klessig, D. F. (1997). Characterization of a S alicylic A cid-I nsensitive Mutant (sai1) of Arabidopsis thaliana, Identified in a Selective Screen Utilizing the SA-Inducible Expression of the tms2 Gene. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi.1997.10.1.69
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.