Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Defense Responses Induced by Soluble Silicon in Cucumber Roots Infected by Pythium spp.

Cherif, M.·1994·Phytopathology

Abstract

The role of silicon (Si) in plant growth was investigated on the basis of induction of defense mechanisms in response to fungal attacks. Amendment of cucumber plants with soluble Si (Si+) resulted in a marked stimulation of chitinase activity and in a more intense and rapid activation of peroxidases and polyphenoloxidases after infection with Pythium spp. Additionally, glycosidically bound phenolics extracted from Si+ plants and subjected to acid or β-glucosidase hydrolysis (Gly extracts) displayed a strong fungistatic activity against P. ultimum, P. aphanidermatum, and Cladosporium cucumerinum. Extracts obtained in the same way from control plants were not inhibitory to fungal growth, regardless of Si treatment [...]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/phyto-84-236

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Cherif, M.
Venue
Phytopathology
Published
1994
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
236
ISSN
0031-949X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991547915
Cited by
363
References
0
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defense Responses Induced by Soluble Silicon in Cucumber Roots Infected by Pythium spp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/phyto-84-236
The paper
Cherif, M. (1994). Defense Responses Induced by Soluble Silicon in Cucumber Roots Infected by Pythium spp. Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-84-236

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.