The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age-Related Changes of the Population of Human Ovarian Follicles: Increase in the Disappearance Rate of Non-Growing and Early-Growing Follicles in Aging Women
Abstract
The effect of aging on the number of non-growing follicles (NGF) and early-growing follicles (EGF) was studied in humans through use of a database obtained by pooling two subsets of ovarian pairs (2 x 43 pairs) collected in two distinct populations. A previously suggested model of exponential regression of NGF counts in relation to the subject's age was tested but did not adequately fit the observed data points. This lack of fit is attributable mainly to the existence of a significant relation between a woman's age and the corresponding NGF count decay rate. Consequently, various regression models were tested. Two different periods of decay rate were observed for each population of small follicles. The first corresponds to younger ages with a decay rate that is slow for both types of follicles, although faster for NGF than for EGF. The second period corresponds to older ages with an accelerated decay rate that appears similar for NGF and EGF. The changing points were found at 38.0 +/- 2.4 and 39.0 +/- 1.9 yr (mean +/- SD) for NGF and EGF, respectively. Extrapolation of the fitted model suggested the presence of approximately 402,000 healthy NGF per ovary at birth and a total exhaustion of the follicular stock at around 74 yr of age. These results support the view that depletion of the NGF pool is caused mainly by atresia in younger women but mainly by entrance of NGF into the growing pool in older women. The mechanisms triggering accelerated entrance into the growth phase of NGF are discussed in relation to the previously reported increase in FSH plasma levels that starts in the late thirties, approximately, and precedes the menopausal period by several years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Cited by
Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles
McGee, E. A., & Hsueh, A. J. W. (2000) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.21.2.0394 · Cited by 1,771
The variability of female reproductive ageing
te Velde, E. R. (2002) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/8.2.141 · Cited by 1,214
Hansen, K. R., Knowlton, N. S., Thyer, A. C., Charleston, J. S., Soules, M. R., & Klein, N. A. (2008) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem408 · Cited by 561
Manipulation of Human Ovarian Function: Physiological Concepts and Clinical Consequences*
Fauser, B. C. J. M., & van Heusden, A. M. (1997) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.18.1.0290 · Cited by 509
Ovarian antral folliculogenesis during the human menstrual cycle: A review
Baerwald, A. R., Adams, G. P., & Pierson, R. A. (2012) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr039 · Cited by 487
Metadata
- Authors
- Gougeon, A., Ecochard, R., & Thalabard, J. C.
- Venue
- Biology of Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-03-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 653-663
- ISSN
- 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-7268
- OpenAlex
- W2009589648
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.