Cited by 1,214Reproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian function and disordersMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

The variability of female reproductive ageing

te Velde, E. R.·2002·Human Reproduction Update

Abstract

The delay in childbearing is an important societal change contributing to an increasing incidence of subfertility. The prevailing concept of female reproductive ageing assumes that the decline of both quantity and quality of the oocyte/follicle pool determines an age-dependent loss of female fertility. There is an apparent discrepancy between the ability to maintain a regular ovulatory cycle pattern and the several years earlier cessation of female fertility. This latter is largely explained by an age-related increase of meiotic non-disjunction leading to chromosomal aneuploidy and early pregnancy loss, such that most embryos from women > or =40 years old are chromosomally abnormal and rarely develop further. The final stage of reproductive ageing-the occurrence of menopause-shows a huge variation between women. Age at last birth in natural fertility populations, which marks the end of female fertility, shows an identically wide variation as age at menopause, but occurs on average 10 years earlier. Given the high heritability for age at menopause, the variation in both age of menopause and last birth are probably under genetic control by the same set of genes. Some of those genes must carry heritable variants which modulate the rate of ovarian ageing and give rise to the wide age variations for the various phases of reproductive ageing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humupd/8.2.141

Cites

223 of 223 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
te Velde, E. R.
Venue
Human Reproduction Update
Published
2002-03-01
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
141-154
ISSN
  • 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2369
OpenAlex
W2098124125
Cited by
1,214
References
223
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 58
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction Update (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Georgetown University
  • Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut
  • Erasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
age at menopause, age at last birth, oocyte quality, meiotic nondisjunction, aneuploidy, subfertility, delayed childbearing, heritability, ovarian aging
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Chromosome Aberrations, Embryo, Mammalian, Female, Ovarian Follicle, Humans, Infertility, Female, Menopause, Middle Aged, Oocytes, Ovary, Reproduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review