The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy1
Abstract
Maternal recognition of pregnancy reflects the various ways in which the mother responds to the presence of a conceptus within her reproductive tract. A part of the biochemical information she senses may be irrelevant to pregnancy outcome, but some reflects the attempts by the conceptus to gain some measure of control over corpus luteum function, uterine blood supply, the mother's immune system, and other aspects of maternal physiology. Most probably as a result of ongoing genetic conflict between the mother and the conceptus, a bewildering range of placental structures and trophoblast signaling mechanisms are encountered in eutherian mammals despite the fact that the uterus and conceptus share a common interest, which is the successful outcome of the pregnancy. Here we review some of the ways that such mammals maintain luteal function in early pregnancy and briefly discuss the related topics of embryonic loss and maternal monitoring of conceptus fitness. We next address the view that the conceptus is an intruder, recognized as foreign by the mother, that likely survives by using strategies analogous to those employed by successful parasites. In this context, we describe the pregnancy-associated glycoproteins, multiple isoforms of which are released at the trophoblast-endometrial interface during pregnancy of ungulate species. These molecules, which are structurally related to pepsin, are proposed to bind and sequester antigenic peptides, thereby serving an immunoprotective role.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy
Haig, D. (1993) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/418300 · Cited by 1,253 · cited 4×
“Haig [9] on the other hand, argues that the high concentra-”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Mechanisms Controlling the Function and Life Span of the Corpus Luteum
Niswender, G. D., Juengel, J. L., Silva, P. J., Rollyson, M. K., & McIntush, E. W. (2000) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2000.80.1.1 · Cited by 1,052
Rosenfeld, C. S. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.24603 · Cited by 280
Zhong, W., Xie, Y., Abdallah, M., Awonuga, A. O., Slater, J. A., Sipahi, L., Puscheck, E. E., & Rappolee, D. A. (2010) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/rep-10-0268 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Michael Roberts, R., Xie, S., & Mathialagan, N.
- Venue
- Biology of Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-02-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 294-302
- ISSN
- 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-7268
- OpenAlex
- W2130230171
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1095/biolreprod54.2.294
- The paper
- Michael Roberts, R., Xie, S., & Mathialagan, N. (1996). Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy1. Biology of Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod54.2.294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.