Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 639

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The vascular protective effects of estrogen

Farhat, Michel Y., Lavigne, Mark C., Ramwell, Peter W.·1996·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

There is now strong epidemiological evidence that estrogen replacement therapy has a protective effect in postmenopausal women. The cardiovascular protective action of estrogen is reported to be mediated indirectly by an effect on lipoprotein metabolism and by a direct effect on the vessel wall itself. Estrogen is active both in vascular smooth muscle and endothelium. Functionally competent estrogen receptors have been identified in vascular smooth muscle cells, and specific binding sites have been demonstrated in endothelium. Estrogen administration promotes vasodilation both in human and experimental animals, in part by stimulating prostacyclin and nitric oxide synthesis. Both the prostaglandin synthase and the constitutive nitric oxide synthase were recently reported to be induced by estrogen treatment. In vitro, estrogen exerts a direct inhibitory effect on the smooth muscle by inhibiting calcium influx. In addition, estrogen inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. In vivo, estradiol‐17β prevents neointimal thickening after balloon injury and in rabbit cardiac transplant allo‐grafts. These data are consistent with in vitro studies wherein estrogen inhibits [ 3 H]thymidine uptake by arterial segments from porcine coronary artery as well as proliferation of rabbit aortic vascular smooth muscle cells induced by hyperlipedemic serum. Recent studies have also reported an effect of estrogen on directed vascular smooth muscle cell migration. Furthermore, like other steroids, the effect of estrogen on the vessel wall has a rapid nongenomic component involving membrane phenomena, such as alteration of membrane ionic permeability and activation of membrane‐bound enzymes, as well as the classical genomic effect involving estrogen receptor activation and gene expression. The nature of these estrogen response genes in the vessel wall and their relation to vasodilation and antiproliferation remain to be determined.—Farhat, M. Y., Lavigne, M. C., Ramwell, P. W. The vascular protective effects of estrogen. FASEB J. 10, 615‐624 (1996)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fasebj.10.5.8621060

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 639

Metadata

Authors
Farhat, M. Y., Lavigne, M. C., & Ramwell, P. W.
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-04
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
615-624
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2124307177
Cited by
639
References
1
FWCI
24.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The vascular protective effects of estrogen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fasebj.10.5.8621060
The paper
Farhat, M. Y., Lavigne, M. C., & Ramwell, P. W. (1996). The vascular protective effects of estrogen. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.10.5.8621060

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.