Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Redox regulation of c‐Jun DNA binding by reversible S‐glutathiolation

Klatt, Peter, Molina, Estela Pineda, de Lacoba, Mario Garcia, Padilla, C. Alicia, Martínez‐Galisteo, Emilia, Barcena, J., Lamas, Santiago·1999·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

Redox control of the transcription factor c‐Jun maps to a single cysteine in its DNA binding domain. However, the nature of the oxidized state of this cysteine and, thus, the potential molecular mechanisms accounting for the redox regulation of c‐Jun DNA binding remain unclear. To address this issue, we have analyzed the purified recombinant c‐Jun DNA binding domain for redox‐dependent thiol modifications and concomitant changes in DNA binding activity. We show that changes in the ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione provide the potential to oxidize c‐Jun sulfhydryls by mechanisms that include both protein disulfide formation and S‐glutathiolation. We provide evidence that S‐glutathiolation, which is specifically targeted to the cysteine residue located in the DNA binding site of the protein, may account for the reversible redox regulation of c‐Jun DNA binding. Furthermore, based on a molecular model of the S‐glutathiolated protein, we discuss the structural elements facilitating S‐glutathiolation and how this modification interferes with DNA binding. Given the structural similarities between the positively charged cysteine‐containing DNA binding motif of c‐Jun and the DNA binding site of related oxidant‐sensitive transcriptional activators, the unprecedented phenomenon of redox‐triggered S‐thiolation of a transcription factor described in this report suggests a novel role for protein thiolation in the redox control of transcription.—Klatt, P., Molina, E. P., de Lacoba, M. G., Padilla, C. A., Martínez‐Galisteo, E., Bárcena, J. A., Lamas, S. Redox regulation of c‐Jun DNA binding by reversible S‐glutathiolation. FASEB J . 13, 1481–1490 (1999)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fasebj.13.12.1481

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Klatt, P., Molina, E. P., de Lacoba, M. G., Padilla, C. A., Martínez‐Galisteo, E., Barcena, J., & Lamas, S.
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-09
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
1481-1490
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2164503407
Cited by
280
References
1
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Redox regulation of c‐Jun DNA binding by reversible S‐glutathiolation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fasebj.13.12.1481
The paper
Klatt, P., Molina, E. P., de Lacoba, M. G., Padilla, C. A., Martínez‐Galisteo, E., Barcena, J., & Lamas, S. (1999). Redox regulation of c‐Jun DNA binding by reversible S‐glutathiolation. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.13.12.1481

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.