Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Monocyte chemotactic proteins MCP‐1, MCP‐2, and MCP‐3 are major attractants for human CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocytes

Loetscher, Pius, Seitz, Michael, Lewis, Ian Clark, Baggiolini, Marco, Moser, Bernhard·1994·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

The responses of lymphocytes to six CC chemokines–MCP‐1, MCP‐2, MCP‐3, MIP‐1α, MIP‐1β, and RANTES–were studied using cloned human CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. All CC chemokines tested induced migration of both types of lymphocytes, whereas two CXC chemokines used as controls, IL‐8 and IP‐10, were inactive. The monocyte chemotactic proteins (MCP‐1, MCP‐2, and MCP‐3) showed a typically bimodal concentration dependence, and were considerably more effective than MIP‐1α, MIP‐10, or RANTES. All CC chemokines also induced a rapid and transient rise in cytosolic free Ca 2+ in either type of T cell. The rise was prevented by Bordetella pertussis toxin treatment, indicating that G‐protein‐coupled receptors are involved in signaling. It was most pronounced with MCP‐1 and MCP‐3, which is in agreement with the efficacy of these chemokines as chemoattractants. The responses to MCP‐2, MIP‐1α, MIP‐1β, and RANTES were weaker, and no changes were obtained on stimulation with IL‐8 or IP‐10. Freshly isolated human blood lymphocytes were also tested, but neither migration nor Ca 2+ changes were observed. Low numbers of high‐affinity receptors for MCP‐1 were found on CD4 + and CD8+ cells (<900 per cell, K d <1 nM), and desensitization experiments showed that MCP‐1, MCP‐2, and MCP‐3 share receptors. Owing to their superior effectiveness on CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, the monocyte chemotactic proteins could play a major role in the recruitment of activated T lymphocytes.—Loetscher, P., Seitz, M., Clark‐Lewis, I., Baggiolini, M., Moser, B. Monocyte chemotactic proteins MCP‐1, MCP‐2, and MCP‐3 are major attractants for human CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocytes. FASEB J. 8: 1055‐1060; 1994.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fasebj.8.13.7926371

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Loetscher, P., Seitz, M., Lewis, I. C., Baggiolini, M., & Moser, B.
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-10
Volume
8
Issue
13
Pages
1055-1060
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W1557678369
Cited by
323
References
0
FWCI
10.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monocyte chemotactic proteins MCP‐1, MCP‐2, and MCP‐3 are major attractants for human CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fasebj.8.13.7926371
The paper
Loetscher, P., Seitz, M., Lewis, I. C., Baggiolini, M., & Moser, B. (1994). Monocyte chemotactic proteins MCP‐1, MCP‐2, and MCP‐3 are major attractants for human CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocytes. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.8.13.7926371

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.