Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Microscopic localization of active proteases by in situ zymography: detection of matrix metalloproteinase activity in vascular tissue

Calis, Zorina S., Sukhova, Galina K., Libby, Peter·1995·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

Many physiological and pathological processes involve tissue remodeling due in part to degradation of extracellular matrix. Several factors limit current approaches used for detection of matrix‐degrading enzymes in tissues. Matrix metallopro‐ teinases (MMPs), enzymes specialized in catabolism of extracellular matrix constituents, require processing from inactive zymogen precursors to gain enzymatic function. Presently available antibodies do not distinguish between precursor and proteolytically processed forms of MMPs. Also, ubiquitous tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) could prevent matrix degradation by MMPs even if the enzymes were in an active form. For these reasons immunocy‐ tochemistry does not provide information regarding the functional state of these enzymes. Biochemical studies of tissue extracts preclude localization and entail the possibility of artifactual activation of the enzymes consequent to tissue disruption. To obviate these problems, we have adapted substrate zymography to frozen tissue sections to assess net proteolytic activity in situ. We report here the details and the validation of this methodology. Initial experiments defined casein fluorescently labeled with resorufin as a useful substrate for detecting stromelysin, and fluo‐ resceinated gelatin or autoradiographic emulsion as suitable for detecting gelatinolytic activity by this approach. Either IIMP‐1 or the Zn chelator 1, 10‐ phenanthroline reduced the zymographic activity in cryosections of atheroma from humans or rabbits. Inhibitors of serine proteases did not reduce the extent of substrate lysis substantially. In situ zymography preserves the fine morphological details of the tissue and can complement the study of enzyme ex‐pression by other microscopic techniques, such as immunocytochemistry. This approach may prove generally applicable for the detection of protease activity in tissue sections permitting exploration of the roles of these enzymes in pathobiology.—Galis, Z. S., Sukhova, G. K., Libby, P. Microscopic localization of active proteases by in situ zymography: detection of matrix metalloproteinase activity in vascular tissue. FASEBJ. 9: 974‐980; (1995)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fasebj.9.10.7615167

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Calis, Z. S., Sukhova, G. K., & Libby, P.
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-07
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
974-980
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W1943923258
Cited by
278
References
0
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microscopic localization of active proteases by in situ zymography: detection of matrix metalloproteinase activity in vascular tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fasebj.9.10.7615167
The paper
Calis, Z. S., Sukhova, G. K., & Libby, P. (1995). Microscopic localization of active proteases by in situ zymography: detection of matrix metalloproteinase activity in vascular tissue. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.9.10.7615167

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.