Impact of Acute Endurance Exercise on Alternative Splicing in Skeletal Muscle
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Alternative splicing (AS) is a highly conserved posttranscriptional mechanism, generating mRNA variants to diversify the proteome. Acute endurance exercise appears to transiently perturb AS in skeletal muscle, but transcriptome‐wide responses are not well defined. We aimed to better understand differential AS (DAS) and differential isoform expression (DIE) in skeletal muscle by comparing short‐read (SRS) and long‐read RNA sequencing (LRS) data. Publicly accessible SRS of clinical exercise studies were extracted from the Gene Expression Omnibus. Oxford Nanopore LRS was performed on mouse gastrocnemius before and following treadmill exercise (30 m running, n = 5 mice/group, 20 total, 10 weeks old). Differential gene expression (DGE) and DIE were analyzed and validated using RT‐PCR and immunoblots. Both SRS and LRS illustrated significant DGE in skeletal muscle postexercise, including 89 RNA‐binding proteins (RBPs). rMATS analysis of SRS revealed that exon‐skipping and intron‐retaining events were the most common. Swan analysis of LRS revealed several common genes across postexercise cohorts with significant DAS but no DGE: 13 exercise‐associated genes, including mSirt2 (24.5% shift at 24 h postexercise [24pe], p = 0.005); 61 RBPs, including mHnrnpa3 (28.5% at 24pe, p = 0.02), mHnrnpa1 (30.6% at 24pe, p = 0.004), and mTia1 (53.6% at 24pe, p = 0.004). We illustrated that acute endurance exercise can elicit changes in AS‐related responses and RBP expression in skeletal muscle, especially at 24pe. SRS is a powerful tool for analyzing DGE but lacks isoform detection, posing a major gap in knowledge of “hidden” genes with no transcriptional but significant DIE and protein expression changes. Additionally, LRS can uncover previously unknown transcript diversity and mechanisms influencing endurance exercise adaptations and responses.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
How many human proteoforms are there?
Aebersold, R., Agar, J. N., Amster, I. J., Baker, M. S., Bertozzi, C. R., Boja, E. S., Costello, C. E., Cravatt, B. F., Fenselau, C., Garcia, B. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2576 · Cited by 907 · see citing works
Transcriptomic profiling of skeletal muscle adaptations to exercise and inactivity
Pillon, N. J., Gabriel, B. M., Dollet, L., Smith, J. A. B., Sardón Puig, L., Botella, J., Bishop, D. J., Krook, A., & Zierath, J. R. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13869-w · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Skeletal muscle transcriptome in healthy aging
Tumasian, R. A., Harish, A., Kundu, G., Yang, J.-H., Ubaida-Mohien, C., Gonzalez-Freire, M., Kaileh, M., Zukley, L. M., Chia, C. W., Lyashkov, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22168-2 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Nova autoregulation reveals dual functions in neuronal splicing
Dredge, B. K., Stefani, G., Engelhard, C. C., & Darnell, R. B. (2005) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600630 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The transcriptional and cellular landscape of cognitive resilience to Alzheimer’s disease
Khera, N., Raju, R. M., & Lipton, S. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2025.1665802 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ahn, A., Kim, J. J., Slusher, A. L., Ying, J. Y., Zhang, E. Y., & Ludlow, A. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ludlow, Andrew T.
- Venue
- FASEB BioAdvances
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-05-26
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e70024-e70024
- ISSN
- 2573-9832 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12312519
- OpenAlex
- W4410741246
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- FASEB BioAdvances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (AR069620)
- National Cancer Institute (R00CA197672)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR069620, P30AR069620)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
- Keywords
- alternative splicing, acute endurance exercise, skeletal muscle, differential isoform expression, RNA-binding proteins, exon skipping, intron retention, hnRNP A1, TIA-1, gastrocnemius, long-read RNA sequencing, short-read RNA sequencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review