The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The anabolic activity of bone tissue, suppressed by disuse, is normalized by brief exposure to extremely low‐magnitude mechanical stimuli
Abstract
It is generally believed that mechanical signals must be large in order to be anabolic to bone tissue. Recent evidence indicates, however, that extremely low‐magnitude (<10 microstrain) mechanical signals readily stimulate bone formation if induced at a high frequency. We examined the ability of extremely low‐magnitude, high‐frequency mechanical signals to restore anabolic bone cell activity inhibited by disuse. Adult female rats were randomly assigned to six groups: baseline control, age‐matched control, mechanically stimulated for 10 min/day, disuse (hind limb suspension), disuse interrupted by 10 min/day of weight bearing, and disuse interrupted by 10 min/day of mechanical stimulation. After a 28 day protocol, bone formation rates (BFR) in the proximal tibia of mechanically stimulated rats increased compared with age‐matched control (+97%). Disuse alone reduced BFR (‐92%), a suppression only slightly curbed when disuse was interrupted by 10 min of weight bearing (‐61%). In contrast, disuse interrupted by 10 min per day of low‐level mechanical intervention normalized BFR to values seen in age‐matched controls. This work indicates that this noninvasive, extremelylow‐level stimulus may provide an effective biomechanical intervention for the bone loss that plagues long‐term space flight, bed rest, or immobilization caused by paralysis.—Rubin, C., Xu, G., Judex, S. The anabolic activity of bone tissue, suppressed by disuse, is normalized by brief exposure to extremely low‐magnitude mechanical stimuli. FASEB J. 15, 2225–2229 (2001)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bone's mechanostat: A 2003 update
Frost, H. M. (2003) · The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1002/ar.a.10119 · Cited by 1,535
BIOMECHANICAL AND MOLECULAR REGULATION OF BONE REMODELING
Robling, A. G., Castillo, A. B., & Turner, C. H. (2006) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095721 · Cited by 1,343
Rubin, C., Recker, R., Cullen, D., Ryaby, J., McCabe, J., & McLeod, K. (2004) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.0301251 · Cited by 592
Self-citationMechanical Strain and Bone Cell Function: A Review
Ehrlich, P. J., & Lanyon, L. E. (2002) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s001980200095 · Cited by 512
Molecular mechanosensors in osteocytes
Qin, L., Liu, W., Cao, H., & Xiao, G. (2020) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/s41413-020-0099-y · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubin, C., Xu, G., & Judex, S.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2225-2229
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W2045059538
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The anabolic activity of bone tissue, suppressed by disuse, is normalized by brief exposure to extremely low‐magnitude mechanical stimuli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fj.01-0166com
- The paper
- Rubin, C., Xu, G., & Judex, S. (2001). The anabolic activity of bone tissue, suppressed by disuse, is normalized by brief exposure to extremely low‐magnitude mechanical stimuli. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.01-0166com
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.