Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 226

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evidence of a Structural Effect for Alcohol Outlet Density: A Multilevel Analysis

Scribner, Richard A., Cohen, Deborah A., Fisher, William·2000·Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ecological studies reveal that alcohol-related outcomes tend to occur in high alcohol outlet density neighborhoods. The ecological design of these studies limits the interpretation of the findings in terms of the level of the effect. The effect of alcohol outlet density could be related to greater individual access to alcohol, an individual level effect, or to the grouping of drinkers by neighborhood, a structural effect at the neighborhood level. METHODS: To differentiate between individual and neighborhood level possibilities, we conducted a multilevel study. Individual distance to the closest alcohol outlet was the individual level measure of the effect of alcohol outlet density, whereas the mean distance to the closest alcohol outlet for all individuals within a census tract was the neighborhood level measure for the effect of alcohol outlet density. We analyzed telephone surveys of 2604 telephone households within 24 census tracts stratified by poverty status and alcohol outlet density. Individual distance to alcohol outlets, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and level of education were entered as individual level covariates, and their corresponding aggregated means were entered as census tract level covariates (i.e., mean distance to outlets, mean age, percentage male, percentage Black, mean education). RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed that 16.2% of the variance in drinking norms and 11.5% of the variance in alcohol consumption were accounted for at the census tract level. In multivariate hierarchical analysis, individual distance to the closest alcohol outlet was unrelated with drinking norms and alcohol consumption, whereas mean distance to the closest alcohol outlet demonstrated a negative relation with drinking norms (betae = -5.50+/-2.37) and with alcohol consumption (betae = -0.477+/-0.195); that is, the higher the mean distance to the closest alcohol outlet, the lower the mean drinking norms score and mean level of alcohol consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the effect of alcohol outlet density on alcohol-related outcomes functions through an effect at the neighborhood level rather than at the individual level. Problem drinkers tend to be grouped in neighborhoods, an effect predicted by alcohol outlet density.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000374-200002000-00009

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 226

Metadata

Authors
Scribner, R. A., Cohen, D. A., & Fisher, W.
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
188-195
ISSN
0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014224277
Cited by
226
References
0
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence of a Structural Effect for Alcohol Outlet Density: A Multilevel Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000374-200002000-00009
The paper
Scribner, R. A., Cohen, D. A., & Fisher, W. (2000). Evidence of a Structural Effect for Alcohol Outlet Density: A Multilevel Analysis. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000374-200002000-00009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.