Cited by 80Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesForeign Body Medical CasesTraumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries

Art. I.—Dr. Harlowʼs Case of Recovery from the passage of an Iron Bar through the Head.

BIGELOW, HENRY J.·1850·The American Journal of the Medical Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000441-185016390-00001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in experienced selfhood can be abrupt and dramatic following brain injury or disease, as in the cases of Phineas Gage and Clive Wearing.

    “Sometimes, changes in experienced selfhood can be abrupt and dramatic, perhaps following a brain injury or disease, as in the notable cases of Phineas Gage and Clive Wearing [66,67].”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BIGELOW, H. J.
Corresponding author
BIGELOW, HENRY J.
Venue
The American Journal of the Medical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1850-07
Volume
16
Issue
39
Pages
13-22
ISSN
0002-9629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965211103
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The American Journal of the Medical Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Foreign Body Medical Cases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
Keywords
penetrating head injury, skull fracture, injury recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review