The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Predictive Value of Modified Computerized Thromboelastography and Platelet Function Analysis for Postoperative Blood Loss in Routine Cardiac Surgery
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Hemorrhage after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remains a clinical problem. Point-of-care tests to identify hemostatic disturbances at the bedside are desirable. In the present study, we evaluated the predictive value of two point-of-care tests on postoperative bleeding after routine cardiac surgery. Prospectively, 255 consecutive patients were studied to compare the ability of modified thromboelastography (ROTEG) as well as a platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) to predict postoperative blood loss. Measurements were performed at three time points: preoperatively, during CPB, and after protamine administration with three modified thromboelastography and PFA tests. The best predictors of increased bleeding tendency were the tests performed after CPB. The angle alpha is the best predictor (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.69) and, in combination with the adenosine diphosphate-PFA test, the predictive accuracy is enhanced (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.73). The negative predictive value for the angle alpha is 82%, although the positive predictive value is small (41%). Thromboelastography is a better predictor than PFA. In routine cardiac surgery, impaired hemostasis as identified by point-of-care tests does not inevitably lead to hemorrhage postoperatively. However, patients with normal test results are unlikely to bleed for hemostatic reasons. Bleeding in these patients is probably caused surgically. The high negative predictive value supports early identification and targeted treatment of surgical bleeding by distinguishing it from a significant coagulopathy. IMPLICATIONS: Thrombelastography and platelet function analysis in routine cardiac surgery demonstrate high negative predictive values for postoperative bleeding, which supports early identification and targeted treatment of surgical bleeding by distinguishing it from a significant coagulopathy. The positive predictive values are small. The best predictors are thrombelastography values obtained after cardiopulmonary bypass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ganter, M. T., & Hofer, C. K. (2008) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e318168b367 · Cited by 677
Multi-centre investigation on reference ranges for ROTEM thromboelastometry
Lang, T., Bauters, A., Braun, S. L., Pötzsch, B., von Pape, K.-W., Kolde, H.-J., & Lakner, M. (2005) · Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis · doi:10.1097/01.mbc.0000169225.31173.19 · Cited by 503
Self-citationHaas, T., Spielmann, N., Mauch, J., Madjdpour, C., Speer, O., Schmugge, M., & Weiss, M. (2012) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aer342 · Cited by 335
Avidan, M. S., Alcock, E. L., Da Fonseca, J., Ponte, J., Desai, J. B., Despotis, G. J., & Hunt, B. J. (2004) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeh037 · Cited by 303
Girdauskas, E., Kempfert, J., Kuntze, T., Borger, M. A., Enders, J., Fassl, J., Falk, V., & Mohr, F.-W. (2010) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.04.043 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Cammerer, U., Dietrich, W., Rampf, T., Braun, S. L., & Richter, J. A.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080441875
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Predictive Value of Modified Computerized Thromboelastography and Platelet Function Analysis for Postoperative Blood Loss in Routine Cardiac Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000539-200301000-00011
- The paper
- Cammerer, U., Dietrich, W., Rampf, T., Braun, S. L., & Richter, J. A. (2003). The Predictive Value of Modified Computerized Thromboelastography and Platelet Function Analysis for Postoperative Blood Loss in Routine Cardiac Surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200301000-00011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.