The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perioperative Cardiac Arrests in Children between 1988 and 2005 at a Tertiary Referral Center: A Study of 92,881 Patients
Open accessAbstract
Background: The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and outcome of perioperative cardiac arrest (CA) in children younger than 18 yr undergoing anesthesia for noncardiac and cardiac procedures at a tertiary care center. Methods: After institutional review board approval (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota), all patients younger than 18 yr who had perioperative CA between November 1, 1988, and June 30, 2005, were identified. Perioperative CA was defined as a need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation or death during anesthesia care. A cardiac procedure was defined as a surgical procedure involving the heart or great vessels requiring an incision. Results: A total of 92,881 anesthetics were administered during the study period, of which 4,242 (5%) were for the repair of congenital heart malformations. The incidence of perioperative CA during noncardiac procedures was 2.9 per 10,000, and the incidence during cardiac procedures was 127 per 10,000. The incidence of perioperative CA attributable to anesthesia was 0.65 per 10,000 anesthetics, representing 7.5% of the 80 perioperative CAs. Both CA incidence and mortality were highest among neonates (0-30 days of life) undergoing cardiac procedures (incidence: 435 per 10,000; mortality: 389 per 10,000). Regardless of procedure type, most patients who experienced perioperative CA (88%) had congenital heart disease. Conclusion: The majority of perioperative CAs were caused by factors not attributed to anesthesia, in distinction to some recent reports. The incidence of perioperative CA is many-fold higher in children undergoing cardiac procedures, suggesting that definition of case mix is necessary to accurately interpret epidemiologic studies of perioperative CA in children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Habre, W., Disma, N., Virag, K., Becke, K., Hansen, T. G., Jöhr, M., Leva, B., Morton, N. S., Vermeulen, P. M., Zielinska, M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30116-9 · Cited by 829
Bhananker, S. M., Ramamoorthy, C., Geiduschek, J. M., Posner, K. L., Domino, K. B., Haberkern, C. M., Campos, J. S., & Morray, J. P. (2007) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000268712.00756.dd · Cited by 720
Anaesthetic considerations for surgery in newborns
Houck, C. S., & Vinson, A. E. (2017) · Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2016-311800 · Cited by 46
Anesthesia for major surgery in the neonate
Kuan, C. C., & Shaw, S. J. (2020) · Anesthesiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2019.10.001 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Flick, R. P., Sprung, J., Harrison, T. E., Gleich, S. J., Schroeder, D. R., Hanson, A. C., Buenvenida, S. L., & Warner, D. O.
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 2007-02-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 226-237
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077082657
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perioperative Cardiac Arrests in Children between 1988 and 2005 at a Tertiary Referral Center: A Study of 92,881 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000542-200702000-00009
- The paper
- Flick, R. P., Sprung, J., Harrison, T. E., Gleich, S. J., Schroeder, D. R., Hanson, A. C., Buenvenida, S. L., & Warner, D. O. (2007). Perioperative Cardiac Arrests in Children between 1988 and 2005 at a Tertiary Referral Center: A Study of 92,881 Patients. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200702000-00009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.