The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determination of Endogenous Cytokines in Chronic Wounds
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This study objectively characterized the microenvironment of indolent, chronic wounds by developing a method by which minute quantities of cytokines could be extracted from chronic wounds and separately identified. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recombinant DNA technology and the ability to clone compounds such as cytokines allow new management schemes for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds. Before treatment with an exogenous cytokine is started, it would be helpful to know the endogenous level of that cytokine in the wound. Although various methods of extracting cytokines from acute wounds have been reported, no techniques have existed to reliably measure endogenous levels of cytokines in chronic wounds. METHODS: Porous, inert hydrophilic dextranomer beads were tested for their ability to absorb or adsorb protein and cytokines in vitro with either albumin or albumin laced with various known amounts of cytokines, and then from chronic human pressure ulcers. The Bradford protein assay was used to determine protein levels. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques were used to determine levels of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AB, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and transforming growth factor-Beta (TGF-beta) extracted by the beads. RESULTS: Between 88% and 98% of known amounts of albumin could be recovered. Similarly, more than 90% of the laced cytokines could be recovered. In 20 grade III/IV pressure ulcers, although protein concentrations were remarkably similar, endogenous levels of cytokine growth factors varied tremendously. Platelet-derived growth factor-AB ranged from 49 to 867 pg/mL; bFGF from 47 to 697 pg/mL; and EGF from nondetectable to 247.5 pg/mL. TGF-B was not detected in 17 of the 20 pressure ulcers. CONCLUSIONS: This new technique appears useful for measuring endogenous levels of cytokines. Levels of cytokines found in these chronic wounds are much lower than those reported from acute wounds. The marked variation found among the 20 wounds may help to explain the differences reported in recent wound healing trials with exogenous cytokines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Regulation of Wound Healing by Growth Factors and Cytokines
WERNER, S., & GROSE, R. (2003) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2003.83.3.835 · Cited by 3,629
Jeffcoate, W. J., & Harding, K. G. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13169-8 · Cited by 1,050
Menke, N. B., Ward, K. R., Witten, T. M., Bonchev, D. G., & Diegelmann, R. F. (2007) · Clinics in Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.12.005 · Cited by 792
Wound healing: Biologic features and approaches to maximize healing trajectories
Robson, M. C., Steed, D. L., & Franz, M. G. (2001) · Current Problems in Surgery · doi:10.1067/msg.2001.111167 · Cited by 503
Self-citationYager, D. R., Zhang, L.-Y., Liang, H.-X., Diegelmann, R. F., & Cohen, I. K. (1996) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12365637 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, D. M., Yu, E. Z., Hennessey, P., Ko, F., & Robson, M. C.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 219
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 688-692
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007409518
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of Endogenous Cytokines in Chronic Wounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-199406000-00012
- The paper
- Cooper, D. M., Yu, E. Z., Hennessey, P., Ko, F., & Robson, M. C. (1994). Determination of Endogenous Cytokines in Chronic Wounds. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199406000-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.