Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional Outcomes After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Chronic Ulcerative Colitis

Open access
Farouk, Ridzuan, Pemberton, John H., Wolff, Bruce G., Dozois, Roger R., Browning, Scott, Larson, Dirk·2000·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC) with specific emphasis on patient sex, childbirth, and age. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Childbirth and the process of aging affect pelvic floor and anal sphincter function independently. Early function after IPAA is good for most patients. Nonetheless, there are concerns about the impact of the aging process as well as pregnancy on long-term functional outcomes after IPAA. METHODS: Functional outcomes using a standardized questionnaire were prospectively assessed for each patient on an annual basis. RESULTS: Of the 1,454 patients who underwent IPAA for CUC between 1981 and 1994, 1,386 were part of this study. Median age was 32 years. Median length of follow-up was 8 years. Pelvic sepsis was the primary cause of pouch failure irrespective of sex or age. Functional outcomes were comparable between men and women. Eighty-five women who became pregnant after IPAA had pouch function, which was comparable with women who did not have a child. Daytime and nocturnal incontinence affected older patients more frequently than younger ones. Incontinence became more common the longer the follow-up in older patients, but this was not found in younger patients. Poor anal function led to pouch excision in only 3 of 204 older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Incontinence rates were significantly higher in older patients after IPAA for CUC compared with younger patients. However, this did not contribute to a greater risk of pouch failure in these older patients. Patient sex and uncomplicated childbirth did not affect long-term functional outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000658-200006000-00017

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
Farouk, R., Pemberton, J. H., Wolff, B. G., Dozois, R. R., Browning, S., & Larson, D.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2000-06
Volume
231
Issue
6
Pages
919-926
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969553914
Cited by
289
References
15
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Outcomes After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Chronic Ulcerative Colitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-200006000-00017
The paper
Farouk, R., Pemberton, J. H., Wolff, B. G., Dozois, R. R., Browning, S., & Larson, D. (2000). Functional Outcomes After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Chronic Ulcerative Colitis. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200006000-00017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.