The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prospective, Age-Related Analysis of Surgical Results, Functional Outcome, and Quality of Life After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Objective To evaluate how age affects functional outcome and quality of life after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). Summary Background Data Because of the limited number of older patients undergoing IPAA, it has been difficult to assess functional outcome and quality of life stratified by age. Methods IPAA was performed in 1895 patients. Patients were stratified by age into <45 (n = 1410), 46–55 (n = 289), 56–65 (n = 154), and more than 65 years (n = 42). Outcome was assessed prospectively. Results are presented at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after surgery. Results Patients were followed for 4.6 ± 3.7 years (maximum, 17 years). Pouch failure occurred in 4.1% (pouch excision or permanent diversion). Incontinence and night time seepage were more common in older patients. There were minor differences in the quality of life, health, energy and happiness between age groups, with a slight benefit for those under 45 years. Fourteen percent or fewer patients experienced social, sexual or work restrictions. Overall, 96% of patients were happy to have undergone their surgery, and 98% recommended it to others. Although the respective figures were 89% and 96% in the over-65 age group, the difference was not significant. Conclusions These data provide a unique assessment of outcome after IPAA at multiple time points. Although functional outcome after IPAA is not as good in older patients, appropriate case selection confers acceptable function and quality of life to patients of all ages. One thousand eight hundred and ninety five patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis since 1983 were grouped by age and analyzed after 1, 3, 5 and 10 years. Although functional outcome was not as good in those over 65 years, quality of life was similar at all ages and over 96% of patients were happy with the results of their surgery. Appropriate case selection confers acceptable outcome for all patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis.
Parks, A. G., & Nicholls, R. J. (1978) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.2.6130.85 · Cited by 1,355
IIeal Pouch-Anal Anastomoses Complications and Function in 1005 Patients
Fazio, V. W., Ziv, Y., Church, J. M., Oakley, J. R., Lavery, I. C., Milsom, J. W., & Schroeder, T. K. (1995) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199508000-00003 · Cited by 1,204
Self-citationLong-Term Functional Outcome and Quality of Life After Stapled Restorative Proctocolectomy
Fazio, V. W., O’Riordain, M. G., Lavery, I. C., Church, J. M., Lau, P., Strong, S. A., & Hull, T. (1999) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199910000-00013 · Cited by 453
Self-citationFunctional Outcomes After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Chronic Ulcerative Colitis
Farouk, R., Pemberton, J. H., Wolff, B. G., Dozois, R. R., Browning, S., & Larson, D. (2000) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200006000-00017 · Cited by 289
Long-term Results of the Ileoanal Pouch Procedure
Marcello, P. W. (1993) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170030003 · Cited by 190
Quality of life of patients with ulcerative colitis preoperatively and postoperatively
McLeod, R. S., Churchill, D. N., Lock, A. M., Vanderburgh, S., & Cohen, Z. (1991) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(91)90081-u · Cited by 186
Sagar, P. M., Lewis, W. G., Holdsworth, P. J., Johnston, D., Mitchell, C., & Macfie, J. M. (1993) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02049866 · Cited by 96
Provenzale, D., Shearin, M., Phillips‐Bute, B. G., Drossman, D. A., Li, Z., Tillinger, W., Schmitt, C., Bollinger, R. R., & Mj, K. (1997) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70074-x · Cited by 89
Delaney, C. P., Dadvand, B., Remzi, F. H., Church, J. M., & Fazio, V. W. (2002) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/s10350-004-6323-9 · Cited by 78
Self-citationRestorative proctocolectomy in patients older than fifty years
Bauer, J. J., Gorfine, S. R., Gelernt, I. M., et al. (1997) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02055379 · Cited by 61
Cited by
Systematic review with meta-analysis: inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly
Gisbert, J. P., & Chaparro, M. (2014) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.12616 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Delaney, C. P., Fazio, V. W., Remzi, F. H., Hammel, J., Church, J. M., Hull, T. L., Senagore, A. J., Strong, S. A., & Lavery, I. C.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 238
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-228
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994498792
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective, Age-Related Analysis of Surgical Results, Functional Outcome, and Quality of Life After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000080825.95166.26
- The paper
- Delaney, C. P., Fazio, V. W., Remzi, F. H., Hammel, J., Church, J. M., Hull, T. L., Senagore, A. J., Strong, S. A., & Lavery, I. C. (2003). Prospective, Age-Related Analysis of Surgical Results, Functional Outcome, and Quality of Life After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000080825.95166.26
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
