The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two Decades of Advances in Understanding of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Abstract
The aim of this article is to highlight advances achieved over the past 2 decades in understanding mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). The first section provides a historical background, which establishes that research during the 1980s was focused on more severe TBI. During the 1990s MTBI received substantially more recognition. The second section explains why the diagnostic frameworks have evolved. The third section examines why 80% to 90% of all MTBI patients have favorable outcomes whereas 10% to 20% do not. This latter subgroup, also known as the Miserable Minority, presents with a plethora of persistent physical, emotional, and cognitive symptoms. A dichotomy has emerged in the literature interpreting these postconcussional symptoms as being psychogenic or neurogenic. This article offers an alternate and more patient-based framework. Instead of the various disciplines focusing on select symptoms, the patient-based approach is aimed at phenomenologically understanding how the MTBI patient's life has changed. The fourth section provides practical steps for treatments. This historical review offers the conclusion that we have focused for too long on diagnostic challenges, without similarly focusing on treatment. It is time that we advance efficacious treatments for the Miserable Minority.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
Definition of mild traumatic brain injury
&NA;, &. (1993) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00001199-199309000-00010 · Cited by 1,910
Neurology (1997) · doi:10.1212/wnl.48.3.581 · Cited by 678
Incidence of mild and moderate brain injury in the United States, 1991
D. M. SOSIN, J. E. S. (1996) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/026990596124719 · Cited by 594
Cited by
Nelson, L. D., Temkin, N. R., Dikmen, S., Barber, J., Giacino, J. T., Yuh, E., Levin, H. S., McCrea, M. A., Stein, M. B., Mukherjee, P., et al. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1313 · Cited by 451
Taylor, B. C., Hagel, E. M., Carlson, K. F., Cifu, D. X., Cutting, A., Bidelspach, D. E., & Sayer, N. A. (2012) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e318245a558 · Cited by 352
Evaluation and treatment of mild traumatic brain injury: the role of neuropsychology
Prince, C., & Bruhns, M. (2017) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci7080105 · Cited by 257
“, pre-morbid psychopathology or personality characteristics) [5,27,28].”
BackgroundRisdall, J. E., & Menon, D. K. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0230 · Cited by 185
Tanriverdi, F., Unluhizarci, K., & Kelestimur, F. (2010) · Pituitary · doi:10.1007/s11102-009-0215-x · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruff, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-18
- ISSN
- 0885-9701 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087150616
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two Decades of Advances in Understanding of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00001199-200501000-00003
- The paper
- Ruff, R. (2005). Two Decades of Advances in Understanding of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200501000-00003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.