Cited by 168Reproductive Health and TechnologiesPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsCannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Recreational drug use and the risk of primary infertility

Mueller, Beth A., Daling, Janet R., Weiss, Noel S., Moore, Donald E.·1990·Epidemiology

Abstract

Recreational drug (marijuana, lysergic acid diethylamide or LSD, speed, cocaine, and "other") exposures of women with primary infertility were compared with those of a matched control group of women with proven fertility. Women who reported smoking marijuana had a slightly elevated risk for infertility due to an ovulatory abnormality (RR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0 to 3.0). The risk was greatest among women who had used marijuana within one year of trying to become pregnant (RR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1 to 4.0). No consistent frequency or duration of use effects could be demonstrated, and the risk was confined to low-frequency users. Risks associated with the use of other drugs were not elevated. The risk of infertility from a tubal abnormality associated with cocaine use was greatly increased (RR = 11.1, 95% CI = 1.7 to 70.8). Our results are consistent with animal studies suggesting that smoking marijuana may cause a transient disruption of ovulatory function. The possibility that cocaine exposure influences the development of tubal infertility needs further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001648-199005000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-prescription and recreational drug use before conception is associated with reduced fertility in men and women.

    “The use of non-prescription and recreational drugs before conception has been associated with reduced fertility in both men and women (Frey 2008, Fronczak 2012, Mueller 1990).”

    From Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility (2021) · cites this paper as Mueller 1990

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mueller, B. A., Daling, J. R., Weiss, N. S., & Moore, D. E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
1990-05
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
195-200
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015278326
Cited by
168
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1 N01 HD 02821, 1 R23 HD 215128-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Keywords
recreational drug use, primary infertility, cannabis, cocaine, ovulatory dysfunction, tubal infertility, lysergic acid diethylamide, speed, smoking, female fertility
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Temperature, Marijuana Abuse, Cocaine, Data Collection, Fallopian Tube Diseases, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Ovulation, Risk Factors, Illicit Drugs, Time Factors, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review