Cited by 90Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesFacial Trauma and Fracture Management

Craniofacial reconstruction with high-density porous polyethylene implants.

Menderes, Adnan, Baytekin, Caghan, Topcu, Alpaslan, Yilmaz, Mustafa, Barutcu, Ali·2004·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

Deformities of the facial skeleton may be reconstructed using autogenic or allogenic materials. Porous polyethylene is one of the few alloplastic materials currently in use having a well-documented history of reconstruction or augmentation in the maxillofacial region. High-density porous polyethylene, which is shown to be effective as a biomaterial, has additional advantages like tissue ingrowth, no capsule formation around it, and easy fixation. In this study, 83 implants in 71 patients were evaluated. Seven patients were in need of a second intervention. Three of the seven secondary interventions were for contour alignment, and four interventions were for extraction of the implants because of extrusion or infection. Placement of porous polyethylene implants directly under the skin without coverage of periosteum or another fascial envelope has an increased risk of early and especially late exposure. In cases like nasal dorsum or microtia reconstruction, we prefer autogenic grafts instead of allogenic materials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001665-200409000-00004

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menderes, A., Baytekin, C., Topcu, A., Yilmaz, M., & Barutcu, A.
Affiliations
Dokuz Eylül University (TR)
Corresponding author
Menderes, Adnan
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2004-09
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
719-724
ISSN
1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035204617
Cited by
90
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Keywords
craniofacial reconstruction, alloplastic implants, implant exposure, implant extrusion, implant-associated infection, microtia reconstruction, nasal dorsum reconstruction, tissue ingrowth
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Facial Bones, Female, Humans, Male, Polyethylenes, Bone Substitutes, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Prostheses and Implants, Prosthesis Implantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review