The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Serial adult sex change involves rapid and reversible changes in forebrain neurochemistry
Abstract
Species with multiple sexual phenotypes provide novel insights into neuroendocrine mechanisms underlying vertebrate sexuality. Many fish species are capable of socially mediated sex reversal: the marine goby (Trimma okinawae) is one of only four species known to change sex more than once and in either direction. We have demonstrated that socially mediated serial sex change involves significant and reversible changes in the size of arginine vasotocin-producing forebrain cells. Sex-specific mating and parental behavior also change during sex reversal: both are regulated by the vasotocin/vasopressin peptide family in vertebrates. These neural and behavioral changes are correlated with modifications in gonad form and function, the form of the sexually dimorphic genital papilla, and the presence of an active male accessory gonadal structure. The speed, reversibility, and extent of these changes in adult sexual phenotype is remarkable relative to the rigid nature of these characteristics in many vertebrates.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sex differences have also been found in AVP/AVT neurons in the PVN in mammals, including humans (Ishunina and Swaab, 1999), and the preoptic area in non-mammalian vertebrates, especially in fish (e.g. Grober and Sunobe, 1996; Semsar and Godwin, 2003).”
From Sexual differentiation of central vasopressin and vasotocin systems in vertebrates: different mechanisms, similar endpoints (2006) · cites this paper as Grober and Sunobe, 1996
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
De Vries, G. J., & Panzica, G. C. (2006) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.050 · Cited by 346
Neuropeptides and the evolution of social behavior
Insel, T. (2000) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00146-x · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Grober, M. S., & Sunobe, T.
- Venue
- NeuroReport
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2945-2950
- ISSN
- 0959-4965
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review