Cited by 10Nerve injury and regenerationNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringSpinal Cord Injury Research

Regeneration of a transected peripheral nerve by transplantation of spinal cord encapsulated in a vein

Klinge, Petra M., Groos, Stephanie, Wewetzer, Konstantin, Haastert, Kirsten, Rosahl, Steffen, Vafa, Morad Ali, Hosseini, Hamid, Samii, Madjid +1 more·2001·Neuroreport

Abstract

The objective was to investigate the regeneration of a transected peripheral nerve after transplantation of fragmented embryonic (E14-15) spinal cord cells which were encapsulated within a vein cavity. After 3 months transplantation, axonal regeneration was observed by staining with HE and antibody to neurofilament subtypes in six of 10 rats. In all six animals compound muscle action potentials to electrical stimulation could be recorded and indicated incomplete reinnervation of the fibular and tibial nerve, respectively. A chronic inflammation process around the transplant and a negative result of staining neurofilaments within the vein cavity and the transected nerve were found in animals lacking electrophysiological response to stimulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-200105080-00043

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An animal model for a biohybrid approach to cure flaccid paralysis involves transplanting embryonic spinal cord cells into a container adapted to the distal nerve stump to restore skeletal muscle function.

    “researchers have developed an animal model for a biohybrid approach to cure flaccid paralysis that involves embryonic spinal cord cell transplantation into a container adapted to the distal nerve stump to restore skeletal muscle function (Katsuki et al., 1997; Thomas et al., 2000; Klinge et al., 2001b)”
  • The presence of a polyimide-based regenerative electrode showed no chronic foreign body response, and the immunohistochemically measured pattern of characteristic proteins was comparable with a healing reaction without any implant.

    “The presence of a polyimide-based regenerative electrode showed no chronic foreign body response, and the immunohistochemically measured pattern of characteristic proteins was comparable with a healing reaction without any implant (Klinge et al., 2001a) .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klinge, P. M., Groos, S., Wewetzer, K., Haastert, K., Rosahl, S., Vafa, M. A., Hosseini, H., Samii, M., & Brinker, T.
Affiliations
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • International Neuroscience Institute (DE)
Venue
Neuroreport
Published
2001-05
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
1271-1275
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088439061
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2015: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
Keywords
peripheral nerve regeneration, nerve transection, spinal cord transplantation, axon regeneration, reinnervation, compound muscle action potential, chronic inflammation, peroneal nerve, tibial nerve
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Axons, Electric Stimulation, Embryo, Mammalian, Female, Femoral Vein, Nerve Regeneration, Peripheral Nerves, Sciatic Nerve, Spinal Cord, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Muscle, Skeletal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review