Cited by 73Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchWilliams Syndrome Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Auditory evoked magnetic fields in adults with fragile X syndrome.

Abstract

Hyper-reactivity and anxiety to sensory stimuli have been described in patients with fragile X syndrome (FXS), and may be related to abnormal processing in afferent sensory pathways. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to measure auditory responses to pure tones in 11 adults with FXS and 11 non-FXS subjects. The amplitude for the N100m auditory evoked field component was significantly higher for patients with FXS than for subjects. FXS subjects also had less lateralized N100m anterior-posterior dipole locations. These data may suggest that more neurons are activated by acoustic stimuli in FXS, consistent with subjective experience of increased stimulus intensity. Anomalous cerebral lateralization may suggest an early critical window for effects on neocortical development of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) produced by the FMR1 gene in individuals with FXS.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-200108080-00056

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bakker, 1994, Cell, 78, 23
  2. Weiler, 1999, Am J Med Genet, 83, 248, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990402)83:4<248::AID-AJMG3>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 73

Metadata

Authors
Rojas, D. C., Benkers, T. L., Rogers, S. J., Teale, P. D., Reite, M. L., & Hagerman, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Health (US)
Venue
Neuroreport
Published
2001-08
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
2573-2576
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981309718
Cited by
73
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 35468, HD 36071, R01HD036071)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, auditory evoked magnetic fields, N100m, hemispheric lateralization, FMRP, FMR1 gene, neocortex development
MeSH terms
Adult, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Intellectual Disability, Magnetoencephalography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review