Shifting students and faculty to a PBL curriculum: attitudes changed and lessons learned
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine is implementing a new undergraduate curriculum that emphasizes active, self-directed learning. The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate shifts in students' attitudes after initial direct experience with problem-based learning (PBL), (2) describe faculty experiences, and (3) develop guidelines for further implementation of PBL. METHOD: Questionnaires were administered at the beginning of the first PBL session and at the close of the last session (five weeks later) to the 250 second-year students in 1992-93 and to their 15 faculty tutors. Quantitative data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance and univariate tests. Open-ended questions were categorized based on common patterns that emerged. RESULTS: Of the 250 students, 196 (78%) responded to the pretest, and 207 (83%) responded to the posttest. There was a statistically significant shift in the students' perceptions from pretest to posttest in agreeing that PBL is more effective than traditional teaching methods (increasing from 38% to 52%). The students rated traditional methods as better for knowledge acquisition, whereas PBL methods were rated better for improving teamwork and doctor-patient relationships. At pretest, the most common themes concerned a perceived danger that PBL would result in knowledge gaps, reinforce the wrong information, and make inefficient use of valuable time. Perceived advantages of PBL included that it is more stimulating and enjoyable, and it teaches students how to learn rather than to memorize. At posttest, there was an increase in favorable comments by the students. Virtually all of the attitudes expressed by the students were shared by the faculty. In addition, at pretest the faculty were anxious about the perceived lack of structure in PBL. CONCLUSION: Direct experience with PBL led to more favorable attitudes among the students and faculty. Recommendations are suggested for other schools and programs seeking to implement PBL curricula.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most tutor satisfaction publications were surveys or questionnaires.
“most of them surveys or questionnaires [85, 88, 92, 98, 108, 110, 119].”
From Effectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [85]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trullàs, J. C., Blay, C., Sarri, E., & Pujol, R. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03154-8 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Where Might Sand Dunes be on Mars? Engaging Students through Inquiry-based Learning in Geography
Spronken-Smith, R., Bullard, J., Ray, W., Roberts, C., & Keiffer, A. (2008) · Journal of Geography in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03098260701731520 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bernstein, P., Tipping, J., Bercovitz, K., & Skinner, H. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-7
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044026357
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 28.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Keywords
- problem-based learning, undergraduate medical education, curriculum implementation, student attitudes, faculty attitudes, self-directed learning, active learning, teamwork, physician-patient relationship, knowledge acquisition
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attitude, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Female, Humans, Male, Ontario, Students, Medical, Teaching, Multivariate Analysis, Problem-Based Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review