Cited by 164Bone Metabolism and DiseasesBone health and osteoporosis researchEstrogen and related hormone effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Canalis, Ernesto·2003·Current Opinion in Rheumatology

Abstract

Glucocorticoids modify osteoblastic cell differentiation, number, and function. Glucocorticoids stimulate osteoclastogenesis and increase the expression of receptor activator of Nuclear factor-kappaB ligand and colony-stimulating factor-1, and decrease the expression of osteoprotegerin. However, the most significant effect of glucocorticoids in bone is an inhibition of bone formation. This inhibition is caused by a decrease in the number of osteoblasts secondary to a shift in the differentiation of mesenchymal cells away from the osteoblastic lineage, and an increase in the death of mature osteoblasts. Glucocorticoids decrease the function of the remaining osteoblasts directly and indirectly through the inhibition of insulin-like growth factor I expression. The stimulation of bone resorption is likely responsible for the initial bone loss after glucocorticoid exposure. Eventually, the inhibition of bone formation will cause a decrease in bone remodeling and a continued increased risk of fractures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002281-200307000-00013

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Weinstein, 2002, J Clin Invest, 109, 1041, 10.1172/JCI0214538 · DOI
  2. Delany, 2001, Mol Endocrinol, 15, 1781, 10.1210/me.15.10.1781 · DOI
  3. Rydziel, 1995, Endocrinology, 136, 4254, 10.1210/en.136.10.4254 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Canalis, E.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Canalis, Ernesto
Venue
Current Opinion in Rheumatology
Published
2003-07
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
454-457
ISSN
1040-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005079460
Cited by
164
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK045227, DK 45227)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, osteogenic differentiation, osteoclastogenesis, RANKL, CSF-1, osteoprotegerin, bone formation inhibition, osteoblast apoptosis, mesenchymal differentiation, insulin-like growth factor I, bone resorption, bone remodeling, fracture risk
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone Resorption, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Osteoblasts, Osteoclasts, Osteogenesis, Osteoporosis, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review