Cited by 81Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid UseAnesthesia and Pain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Intermediate- and Long-Term Use of Opioids on Cognition in Patients With Chronic Pain

Chapman, Stanley L., Byas-Smith, Michael G., Reed, Barbara A.·2002·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

The authors review research on the intermediate- and long-term effects of taking opioid medication on cognitive functioning in patients with chronic cancer and noncancer pain. Opioids seem to be more likely to worsen cognitive performance during the first few days of use and during the first few hours after a given dose, particularly on timed performance in psychomotor tasks. Results have been inconsistent regarding what decrements in cognitive performance are observed when patients with chronic pain who have been using opioids for more than three days are compared with healthy volunteers. Relatively few differences have been found when cognitive performance in these patients is compared with their performance before taking opioids, or with the performance of a comparable pain population not taking opioids. Major unresolved questions remain regarding such important issues as effects of different types of opioids, dose effects, interactions with other medications, and subject variables.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002508-200207001-00010

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Turk, 1992, APS Bull, 2, 1
  2. O'Neill, 1994, Cancer Surv, 21, 67
  3. Kerr, 1991, Neuropsychopharmacol, 5, 157
  4. Zacny, 1994, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 268, 1
  5. Zacny JP Lichtor, 1994, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 270, 579
  6. Twycross, 1979, Adv Pain Res Ther, 2, 291

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chapman, S. L., Byas-Smith, M. G., & Reed, B. A.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Chapman, Stanley L.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2002-07
Volume
18
Issue
Supplement
Pages
S83-S90
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2328048816
Cited by
81
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
opioids, cognitive function, chronic pain, cognitive impairment, psychomotor performance, cancer pain, non-cancer pain, drug interactions, chronic opioid use
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Cognition, Humans, Narcotics, Neoplasms, Pain, Dextropropoxyphene, Time Factors, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Epidemiologic Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review