Cited by 82Cancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer StudiesOral health in cancer treatment

Quality of life experienced by patients receiving radiation treatment for cancers of the head and neck

Rose, Pauline, Yates, Patsy·2001·Cancer Nursing

Abstract

The purpose of this descriptive study was to explore the quality of life for 58 outpatients during and after a course of radiation treatment for cancers of the head and neck. Data were collected at three time points: T1 (first week of treatment), T2 (last week of treatment), and T3 (1 month after treatment). Patients completed two measures that assessed physical, emotional, functional, and social aspects of well-being: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Head and Neck (FACT-H&N) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance and post hoc t tests were performed to assess changes in quality of life over the three time points. Results indicated overall increased levels of physical and functional symptoms, head and neck specific concerns, and depression between T1 and T2. However, except for depression, there was some improvement between scores on each of these measures of physical and functional well-being between T2 and T3, although this improvement was not to the pretreatment level. The FACT subscales assessing social and emotional well-being, and the HADS subscale showed no significant changes across time. Implications of this study relate to the ongoing need for interventions to assist patients once they have completed the radiation treatment course, and to improved assessment in some areas of emotional distress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002820-200108000-00002

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rose, P., & Yates, P.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Rose, Pauline
Venue
Cancer Nursing
Published
2001-08
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
255-263
ISSN
0162-220X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1507205522
Cited by
82
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Oral health in cancer treatment
Keywords
quality of life, head and neck cancer, radiotherapy, FACT-H&N, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms, functional well-being, emotional distress, social well-being, outpatients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Assessment, Oncology Nursing, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review