Cited by 69Cancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer StudiesMusic Therapy and Health

Exploring the prevalence and experience of mask anxiety for the person with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy

Open access
Nixon, Jodie L., Cartmill, Bena, Turner, Jane, Pigott, Amanda E., Brown, Elizabeth, Wall, Laurelie R., Ward, Elizabeth C., Porceddu, Sandro V.·2018·Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While use of a thermoplastic mask during radiotherapy (RT) treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) is an essential component of safe patient care, there is little understanding of the extent to which this evokes anxiety (i.e. "mask anxiety") for the person undergoing treatment. METHODS: A mixed method, convergent design was used to examine the prevalence and experience of mask anxiety using two clinical cohorts. In phase one, a cohort of 100 patients undergoing RT for HNC were assessed for self-perceived mask anxiety using a modified distress thermometer screening tool. In phase two, a separate cohort of 20 patients who identified as having mask anxiety participated in individual interpretative descriptive interviews to explore the nature of their experience. RESULTS: In phase one, 26% of participants self-identified as being anxious about the use of a thermoplastic mask. In phase two thematic analysis of the interviews revealed two over-arching themes relating to the person's experience of mask anxiety: contributors to the mask anxiety (vulnerability, response to experience and expectations); and how the person was going to manage the mask anxiety during treatment (strategies and mindset). CONCLUSIONS: Mask anxiety impacted a quarter of participants undergoing radiotherapy for HNC. In line with the themes elicited from the participants, implementation of routine screening to ensure early identification, and patient education to assist preparation for wearing the mask during RT are strategies that could improve current management of mask anxiety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmrs.308

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]Patton MQ, Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif, 2002.
  2. [14]Morse JM. “Emerging from the data”: the cognitive process of analysis in qualitative inquiry In: Morse JM (ed). Critical Issues In Qualatative Research Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994; pp. 22– 43.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nixon, J. L., Cartmill, B., Turner, J., Pigott, A. E., Brown, E., Wall, L. R., Ward, E. C., & Porceddu, S. V.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU)
  • School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences University of Queensland Brisbane Australia
Corresponding author
Nixon, Jodie L.
Venue
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-30
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
282-290
ISSN
  • 2051-3895 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-3909
OpenAlex
W2898978222
Cited by
69
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
Keywords
head and neck cancer, radiotherapy, thermoplastic mask, patient experience, anxiety prevalence, distress screening, coping strategies, patient education, anxiety screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Masks, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review