Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regional Cerebral Glucose Metabolism in Healthy Volunteers Determined by Fluordeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography: Appearance and Variance in the Transaxial, Coronal, and Sagittal Planes

ANÇEVIĆ, VELIMIR, ALAVI, ABASS, SOUDER, ELAINE, MOZLEY, P. DAVID, GUR, RAQUEL E., BÉNARD, FRANÇOIS, MUNZ, DIETER L.·2000·Clinical Nuclear Medicine

Abstract

Purpose In this study, the contribution of the transaxial, coronal, and sagittal planes in evaluations of regional cerebral glucose metabolism was investigated in healthy volunteers as determined by fluorine-18-labeled 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) and high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET). Methods One hundred twenty-seven healthy right-handed volunteers were injected with 4.2 MBq/kg (0.11 mCi) body weight FDG and imaged in a PENN PET H 240 scanner. Images were corrected for scatter and random coincidences and reconstructed in all three planes into 6- to 8-mm-thick slices. The reconstructed images were corrected for attenuation using the Chang algorithm. The transverse, coronal, and sagittal images were read independently of each other using a qualitative scale in which 1 = equal to, 2 = mildly, 3 = moderately, and 4 = markedly less than the area with the highest glucose metabolism in the respective plane. Results The areas with the highest glucose metabolisms were the posterior cingulate gyri with mean scores of 1.1 to 1.2, thalami (1.2 to 1.3), basal ganglia (1.5 to 1.9), and visual cortex (1.6). The lowest values were found in the occipital cortex (2.7 to 2.8) and the cerebellum (2.3 to 2.4). Whereas reliable analysis of the mesial temporal aspects was not feasible in the sagittal plane, the anterior poles of the temporal and frontal lobes could not be evaluated in the coronal or the inferior temporal areas in the transaxial slices. In all three planes, reg…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003072-200008000-00005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Duara, 1983, Brain, 106, 761, 10.1093/brain/106.3.761 · DOI
  2. Duara, 1984, Ann Neurol, 16, 703, 10.1002/ana.410160613 · DOI
  3. Chawluk, 1985, J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab, 5, S121
  4. Chawluk, 1987, J Nucl Med, 28, 431
  5. Yoshii, 1988, J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab, 8, 654, 10.1038/jcbfm.1988.112 · DOI
  6. Alavi, 1989, J Neuropsychiatry, 1, S51
  7. Weiss, 1991, J Nucl Med, 31, 771P
  8. Loessner, 1994, J Nucl Med, 36, 1141
  9. Moeller, 1996, J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 16, 385, 10.1097/00004647-199605000-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Duara, 1985, J Nucl Med, 26, 68
  11. Mazziotta, 1981, Neurology, 31, 503, 10.1212/WNL.31.5.503 · DOI
  12. Heiss, 1984, J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab, 4, 212, 10.1038/jcbfm.1984.30 · DOI
  13. Fukuyama, 1991, J Neurol Sci, 106, 128, 10.1016/0022-510X(91)90249-7 · DOI
  14. Reivich, 1979, Circ Res, 44, 127, 10.1161/01.RES.44.1.127 · DOI
  15. Karp, 1990, J Nucl Med, 31, 617
  16. Alavi, 1986, Semin Nucl Med, 16, 2, 10.1016/S0001-2998(86)80002-2 · DOI
  17. Chang, 1978, IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 25, 638, 10.1109/TNS.1978.4329385 · DOI
  18. Strother, 1991, J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab, 11, A3, 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.31 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
ANÇEVIĆ, V., ALAVI, A., SOUDER, E., MOZLEY, P. D., GUR, R. E., BÉNARD, F., & MUNZ, D. L.
Venue
Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Published
2000-08
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
596-602
ISSN
0363-9762
Cited by
29
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review