The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Clinical Perspective on Common Forms of Acquired Heterotopic Ossification
Abstract
The clinical courses of heterotopic ossification (HO) as a consequence of trauma and central nervous system insults have many similarities as well as dissimilarities. Detection is commonly noted at two months. The incidence of clinically significant HO is 10%-20%. Approximately 10% of the HO is massive and causes severe restriction in joint motion or ankylosis. The most common sign and symptom are decreased range of motion and pain. The locations are the proximal limbs and joints. Sites of HO about a joint may vary according to the etiology of the HO. Roentgenographic evolution of HO occurs during a six-month period in the majority of patients. Treatment modalities include diphosphonates, indomethacin, radiation, range of motion exercises, and surgical excision. Surgical timing differs according to etiology: traumatic HO may be resected at six months; spinal cord injury HO is excised at one year; and traumatic brain injury HO is removed at 1.5 years. A small number of patients have progression of HO with medicinal treatment and recurrence after resection. The patients seem recalcitrant to present treatment methods regardless of the HO etiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heterotopic ossification: A review
Vanden Bossche, L., & Vanderstraeten, G. (2005) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1080/16501970510027628 · Cited by 448
Potent inhibition of heterotopic ossification by nuclear retinoic acid receptor-γ agonists
Shimono, K., Tung, W.-E., Macolino, C., Chi, A. H.-T., Didizian, J. H., Mundy, C., Chandraratna, R. A., Mishina, Y., Enomoto-Iwamoto, M., Pacifici, M., et al. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2334 · Cited by 334
Balboni, T. A., Gobezie, R., & Mamon, H. J. (2006) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.053 · Cited by 305
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation and Advanced Prosthetic Arms
Cheesborough, J., Smith, L., Kuiken, T., & Dumanian, G. (2015) · Seminars in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1055/s-0035-1544166 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- GARLAND, D. E.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 263
- Issue
- 263
- Pages
- 13-29
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976751723
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Clinical Perspective on Common Forms of Acquired Heterotopic Ossification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003086-199102000-00003
- The paper
- GARLAND, D. E. (1991). A Clinical Perspective on Common Forms of Acquired Heterotopic Ossification. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199102000-00003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.