The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spectrum of Fungal Keratitis at Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the spectrum of fungal keratitis at Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 24 cases of culture-positive fungal keratitis treated from January 1991 to March 1999 at Wills Eye Hospital. Risk factors, fungal identification, antifungal treatment, and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 24 eyes (24 patients). Fourteen patients (58.3%) were female. The mean age was 59 years (range, 19-86 years). Predisposing factors included chronic ocular surface disease (41.7%), contact lens wear (29.2%), atopic disease (16.7%), topical steroid use (16.7%), and ocular trauma (8.3%). Early identification of fungal elements was achieved by staining of corneal scrapings in 18 cases (75%). Half of the cases (12 eyes) had corneal infections caused by yeast, and the other half by filamentous fungi. Candida albicans was the most commonly isolated organism (45.8%), followed by Fusarium sp (25%). Natamycin and amphotericin B were the topical antifungals most frequently used, while systemic treatment commonly used included fluconazole, ketoconazole, or itraconazole. Six patients (25%) had penetrating keratoplasty during the acute stage of infection. After a mean follow-up of nine months, 13 eyes (54.1%) had the best corrected visual acuity 20/100 or better. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to other studies from the northern United States, we found Fusarium sp the most commonly isolated filamentous fungus. In our series, C. albicans was the most frequent cause of fungal keratitis, and a past history of ocular trauma was uncommon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Leck, A. K., Thomas, P. A., Hagan, M., Kaliamurthy, J., Ackuaku, E., John, M., Newman, M. J., Codjoe, F. S., Opintan, J. A., Kalavathy, C. M., et al. (2002) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.86.11.1211 · Cited by 466
Fungal infections of the cornea
Thomas, P. A. (2003) · Eye · doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6700557 · Cited by 434
Microbial Keratitis in South India: Influence of Risk Factors, Climate, and Geographical Variation
Bharathi, M. J., Ramakrishnan, R., Meenakshi, R., Padmavathy, S., Shivakumar, C., & Srinivasan, M. (2007) · Ophthalmic Epidemiology · doi:10.1080/09286580601001347 · Cited by 332
A Hydrogel-Based Hybrid Theranostic Contact Lens for Fungal Keratitis
Huang, J.-F., Zhong, J., Chen, G.-P., Lin, Z.-T., Deng, Y., Liu, Y.-L., Cao, P.-Y., Wang, B., Wei, Y., Wu, T., et al. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b00601 · Cited by 257
An Outbreak of Fusarium Keratitis Associated With Contact Lens Wear in Singapore
Khor, W.-B., Aung, T., Saw, S.-M., Wong, T.-Y., Tambyah, P. A., Tan, A.-L., Beuerman, R., Lim, L., Chan, W.-K., Heng, W.-J., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.24.2867 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanure, M. A. G., Cohen, E. J., Sudesh, S., Rapuano, C. J., & Laibson, P. R.
- Venue
- Cornea
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 307-312
- ISSN
- 0277-3740 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967363770
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectrum of Fungal Keratitis at Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003226-200005000-00010
- The paper
- Tanure, M. A. G., Cohen, E. J., Sudesh, S., Rapuano, C. J., & Laibson, P. R. (2000). Spectrum of Fungal Keratitis at Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cornea. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200005000-00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.