Cited by 101Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryNosocomial Infections in ICU

Gastric feeding with erythromycin is equivalent to transpyloric feeding in the critically ill

Boivin, Michel A., Levy, Howard·2001·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adding erythromycin to a gastric feeding regimen could render it as effective in meeting nutritional needs as transpyloric feeding. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled study. SETTING: University hospital medical, surgical, and neurologic care intensive care units. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients, requiring a projected 96 hrs of enteral feeding, who had no specific indication for tube location (gastric or transpyloric). Eighty patients were randomized. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to gastric feeding with erythromycin (200 mg iv) given every 8 hrs or feeding through a transpylorically placed feeding tube. Goal rate and feeding advancement were determined by protocol. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the 96-hr period, the gastric group received 74% of their goal calories and the transpyloric group received 67%. The only day on which gastric feedings were superior was the first study day, where the gastric group attained 55% of their goal, compared with 44% in the transpyloric group. This 1-day difference was the result of an initial failure of tube placement in some subjects. Exclusion of these patients did not change overall results. Nutritional indexes, length of stay in the intensive care unit, ventilator dependence, and survival were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric feeding with erythromycin as a prokinetic is equivalent to transpyloric feeding in meeting the nutritional goals of the critically ill.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boivin, M. A., & Levy, H.
Affiliations
  • American Thoracic Society (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2001-10
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1916-1919
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070694912
Cited by
101
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (5M01-RR00997, M01RR000997)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Keywords
gastric tube feeding, transpyloric feeding, erythromycin, prokinetic agents, enteral nutrition, critically ill patients, intensive care unit, tube placement, nutritional adequacy
MeSH terms
Critical Care, Drug Administration Schedule, Enteral Nutrition, Erythromycin, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrostomy, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Requirements, Probability, Pylorus, Sensitivity and Specificity, Chi-Square Distribution, Critical Illness, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review