Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parenteral l-alanyl-l-glutamine improves 6-month outcome in critically ill patients*

Goeters, Christiane, Wenn, Anke, Mertes, Norbert, Wempe, Carola, Van Aken, Hugo, Stehle, Peter, Bone, Hans-Georg·2002·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Glutamine is recognized as a conditionally indispensable amino acid. The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether supplemental l-alanyl-l-glutamine to parenteral nutrition can alter clinical outcome in intensive care unit patients. DESIGN: Prospective, open, randomized trial. SETTING: Postoperative intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Male and female critically ill patients with indications for parenteral nutrition and an expected stay on intensive care unit for >or=5 days. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either standard parenteral nutrition or supplemented parenteral nutrition with l-alanyl-l-glutamine (0.3 g.kg.body weight [bw] per day). Total amount of amino acids comprised 1.5 g.kg.bw per day. Caloric support was managed by metabolic variables (glucose and triglyceride plasma values). Target values for energy supply were 3 g.kg.bw carbohydrates and 1 g.kg.bw fat per day. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical treatment, nutritional therapy, vital variables, and biochemical data were recorded. Clinical outcome was measured by average length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital and the mortality in the intensive care unit and within 30 days and 6 months. A total of 144 patients were randomized; 95 patients were treated for >or=5 days and 68 patients for >or=9 days under standardized conditions. In the treatment group, plasma glutamine concentrations significantly increased within 6-9 days. Six-month survival was significantly improved for patients treated for >or=9 days (66.7% [glutamine supplemented] vs. 40% [control]). CONCLUSION: Study results support the hypothesis that replacement of glutamine deficiency may correct the excess mortality in intensive care unit patients caused by inadequate parenteral nutrition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003246-200209000-00013

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Goeters, C., Wenn, A., Mertes, N., Wempe, C., Van Aken, H., Stehle, P., & Bone, H.-G.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2002-09
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
2032-2037
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030419714
Cited by
273
References
22
FWCI
13.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parenteral l-alanyl-l-glutamine improves 6-month outcome in critically ill patients*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003246-200209000-00013
The paper
Goeters, C., Wenn, A., Mertes, N., Wempe, C., Van Aken, H., Stehle, P., & Bone, H.-G. (2002). Parenteral l-alanyl-l-glutamine improves 6-month outcome in critically ill patients*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200209000-00013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.