The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Findings for a Group of Infants and Young Children with Auditory Neuropathy
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of auditory neuropathy in a group of infants at risk for hearing impairment and to present an overview of the clinical findings for affected children. DESIGN: Results for 20 subjects who showed repeatable cochlear microphonic potentials in the absence of click-evoked auditory brain stem responses are included in this study. Behavioral and steady state evoked potential thresholds were established in each case. Where possible, otoacoustic emission and speech perception results (unaided and aided) also were obtained. RESULTS: One in 433 (0.23%) of the children in our series had evidence of auditory neuropathy. The audiometric findings for these subjects varied significantly, with behavioral thresholds ranging from normal to profound levels. Discrimination skills were also variable. Approximately half of the subjects showed little understanding, or even awareness, of speech inputs in both the unaided and aided conditions. There were, however, a number of children who could score at significant levels on speech discrimination tasks and who benefited from the provision of amplification. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that auditory neuropathy is more common in the infant population than previously suspected. The effects of neuropathy on auditory function appear to be idiosyncratic, producing significant variations in both the detection and discrimination of auditory signals. As such, the management of children with this disorder must allow for individual differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internodal conduction in undissected demyelinated nerve fibres
Rasminsky, M., & Sears, T. A. (1972) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010035 · Cited by 329
Cited by
Human auditory steady-state responses: Respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos
Picton, T. W., John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Purcell, D. (2003) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992020309101316 · Cited by 846
Blamey, P., Artieres, F., Başkent, D., Bergeron, F., Beynon, A., Burke, E., Dillier, N., Dowell, R., Fraysse, B., Gallégo, S., et al. (2013) · Audiology and Neurotology · doi:10.1159/000343189 · Cited by 676
Self-citationAn Exploratory Look at Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: Is Earliest Always Best?
Holt, R. F., & Svirsky, M. A. (2008) · Ear & Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31816c409f · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Rance, G., Beer, D. E., Cone-Wesson, B., Shepherd, R. K., Dowell, R. C., King, A. M., Rickards, F. W., & Clark, G. M.
- Venue
- Ear and Hearing
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 238-252
- ISSN
- 0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998558200
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Findings for a Group of Infants and Young Children with Auditory Neuropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003446-199906000-00006
- The paper
- Rance, G., Beer, D. E., Cone-Wesson, B., Shepherd, R. K., Dowell, R. C., King, A. M., Rickards, F. W., & Clark, G. M. (1999). Clinical Findings for a Group of Infants and Young Children with Auditory Neuropathy. Ear and Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199906000-00006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.