The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Central Auditory Plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 Complex after Speech-Sound Training
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the N1-P2 complex reflects training-induced changes in neural activity associated with improved voice-onset-time (VOT) perception. DESIGN: Auditory cortical evoked potentials N1 and P2 were obtained from 10 normal-hearing young adults in response to two synthetic speech variants of the syllable /ba/. Using a repeated measures design, subjects were tested before and after training both behaviorally and neurophysiologically to determine whether there were training-related changes. In between pre- and post-testing sessions, subjects were trained to distinguish the -20 and -10 msec VOT /ba/ syllables as being different from each other. Two stimulus presentation rates were used during electrophysiologic testing (390 msec and 910 msec interstimulus interval). RESULTS: Before training, subjects perceived both the -20 msec and -10 msec VOT stimuli as /ba/. Through training, subjects learned to identify the -20 msec VOT stimulus as "mba" and -10 msec VOT stimulus as "ba." As subjects learned to correctly identify the difference between the -20 msec and -10 msec VOT syllabi, an increase in N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude was observed. The effects of training were most obvious at the slower stimulus presentation rate. CONCLUSIONS: As perception improved, N1-P2 amplitude increased. These changes in waveform morphology are thought to reflect increases in neural synchrony as well as strengthened neural connections associated with improved speech perception. These findings suggest that the N1-P2 complex may have clinical applications as an objective physiologic correlate of speech-sound representation associated with speech-sound training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation
Jasper, H. H. (1958) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · Cited by 6,567
Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x · Cited by 3,321
Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology
(1994) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(94)90118-x · Cited by 1,759
Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer
Klatt, D. H. (1980) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.383940 · Cited by 1,583
Kaplan, S. J. (1950) · PubMed Central · Cited by 1,050
Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials
Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (1985) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(85)90054-1 · Cited by 799
Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials
Ponton, C. W., Eggermont, J. J., Kwong, B., & Don, M. (2000) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00236-9 · Cited by 791
Self-citationJournal of the American Academy of Audiology
(2020) · Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · doi:10.1055/s-00046128 · Cited by 787
The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp
Vaughan, H. G., & Ritter, W. (1970) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(70)90228-2 · Cited by 693
Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model
Scherg, M., & Von Cramon, D. (1985) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(85)90033-4 · Cited by 683
Cited by
Eggermont, J. J., & Roberts, L. E. (2004) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.08.010 · Cited by 991
Short-Term Music Training Enhances Verbal Intelligence and Executive Function
Moreno, S., Bialystok, E., Barac, R., Schellenberg, E. G., Cepeda, N. J., & Chau, T. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611416999 · Cited by 803
Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained
May, P. J. C., & Tiitinen, H. (2010) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00856.x · Cited by 549
Music acquisition: Effects of enculturation and formal training on development
Hannon, E. E., & Trainor, L. J. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.008 · Cited by 493
Brain potentials to native and non-native speech contrasts in 7- and 11-month-old American infants
Rivera‐Gaxiola, M., Silva‐Pereyra, J., & Kuhl, P. K. (2005) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00403.x · Cited by 413
Metadata
- Authors
- Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., McGee, T., Ponton, C., & Otis, A. B.
- Venue
- Ear and Hearing
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 79-90
- ISSN
- 0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025894639
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 4.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Central Auditory Plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 Complex after Speech-Sound Training. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001
- The paper
- Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., McGee, T., Ponton, C., & Otis, A. B. (2001). Central Auditory Plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 Complex after Speech-Sound Training. Ear and Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.