Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Central Auditory Plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 Complex after Speech-Sound Training

Tremblay, Kelly, Kraus, Nina, McGee, Therese, Ponton, Curtis, Otis, and Brian·2001·Ear and Hearing

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the N1-P2 complex reflects training-induced changes in neural activity associated with improved voice-onset-time (VOT) perception. DESIGN: Auditory cortical evoked potentials N1 and P2 were obtained from 10 normal-hearing young adults in response to two synthetic speech variants of the syllable /ba/. Using a repeated measures design, subjects were tested before and after training both behaviorally and neurophysiologically to determine whether there were training-related changes. In between pre- and post-testing sessions, subjects were trained to distinguish the -20 and -10 msec VOT /ba/ syllables as being different from each other. Two stimulus presentation rates were used during electrophysiologic testing (390 msec and 910 msec interstimulus interval). RESULTS: Before training, subjects perceived both the -20 msec and -10 msec VOT stimuli as /ba/. Through training, subjects learned to identify the -20 msec VOT stimulus as "mba" and -10 msec VOT stimulus as "ba." As subjects learned to correctly identify the difference between the -20 msec and -10 msec VOT syllabi, an increase in N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude was observed. The effects of training were most obvious at the slower stimulus presentation rate. CONCLUSIONS: As perception improved, N1-P2 amplitude increased. These changes in waveform morphology are thought to reflect increases in neural synchrony as well as strengthened neural connections associated with improved speech perception. These findings suggest that the N1-P2 complex may have clinical applications as an objective physiologic correlate of speech-sound representation associated with speech-sound training.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

See all 444

Metadata

Authors
Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., McGee, T., Ponton, C., & Otis, A. B.
Venue
Ear and Hearing
Published
2001-04
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
79-90
ISSN
0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025894639
Cited by
444
References
57
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Central Auditory Plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 Complex after Speech-Sound Training. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001
The paper
Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., McGee, T., Ponton, C., & Otis, A. B. (2001). Central Auditory Plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 Complex after Speech-Sound Training. Ear and Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.