The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Early Auditory Experience on the Spoken Language of Deaf Children at 3 Years of Age
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Objective: By age 3, typically developing children have achieved extensive vocabulary and syntax skills that facilitate both cognitive and social development. Substantial delays in spoken language acquisition have been documented for children with severe to profound deafness, even those with auditory oral training and early hearing aid use. This study documents the spoken language skills achieved by orally educated 3-yr-olds whose profound hearing loss was identified and hearing aids fitted between 1 and 30 mo of age and who received a cochlear implant between 12 and 38 mo of age. The purpose of the analysis was to examine the effects of age, duration, and type of early auditory experience on spoken language competence at age 3.5 yr. Design: The spoken language skills of 76 children who had used a cochlear implant for at least 7 mo were evaluated via standardized 30-minute language sample analysis, a parent-completed vocabulary checklist, and a teacher language-rating scale. The children were recruited from and enrolled in oral education programs or therapy practices across the United States. Inclusion criteria included presumed deaf since birth, English the primary language of the home, no other known conditions that interfere with speech/language development, enrolled in programs using oral education methods, and no known problems with the cochlear implant lasting more than 30 days. Results: Strong correlations were obtained among all language measures. Therefore, principal components analysis was used to derive a single Language Factor score for each child. A number of possible predictors of language outcome were examined, including age at identification and intervention with a hearing aid, duration of use of a hearing aid, pre-implant pure-tone average (PTA) threshold with a hearing aid, PTA threshold with a cochlear implant, and duration of use of a cochlear implant/age at implantation (the last two variables were practically identical because all children were tested between 40 and 44 mo of age). Examination of the independent influence of these predictors through multiple regression analysis revealed that pre-implant–aided PTA threshold and duration of cochlear implant use (i.e., age at implant) accounted for 58% of the variance in Language Factor scores. A significant negative coefficient associated with pre-implant–aided threshold indicated that children with poorer hearing before implantation exhibited poorer language skills at age 3.5 yr. Likewise, a strong positive coefficient associated with duration of implant use indicated that children who had used their implant for a longer period of time (i.e., who were implanted at an earlier age) exhibited better language at age 3.5 yr. Age at identification and amplification was unrelated to language outcome, as was aided threshold with the cochlear implant. A significant quadratic trend in the relation between duration of implant use and language score revealed a steady increase in language skill (at age 3.5 yr) for each additional month of use of a cochlear implant after the first 12 mo of implant use. The advantage to language of longer implant use became more pronounced over time. Conclusions: Longer use of a cochlear implant in infancy and very early childhood dramatically affects the amount of spoken language exhibited by 3-yr-old, profoundly deaf children. In this sample, the amount of pre-implant intervention with a hearing aid was not related to language outcome at 3.5 yr of age. Rather, it was cochlear implantation at a younger age that served to promote spoken language competence. The previously identified language-facilitating factors of early identification of hearing impairment and early educational intervention may not be sufficient for optimizing spoken language of profoundly deaf children unless it leads to early cochlear implantation. By age three, typically developing children have achieved extensive vocabulary and syntactic skills that facilitate both cognitive and social development. This study documents the spoken language skills achieved by 76 orally educated three-year-olds who were identified between 1-30 months of age and who received a cochlear implant (CI) between 12-38 months of age. The effects of age, duration and type of early auditory experience on spoken language competence at age 3.5 were examined. Examination of the independent influence of several predictor variables through multiple regression analysis revealed that pre-implant aided PTA threshold and duration of CI use (i.e., age at implant) accounted for 58% of the variance. Age at identification, amplification, and CI aided threshold were unrelated to language outcome. A steady increase in language skill (at age 3.5) was observed for each additional month of use of a cochlear implant after the first 12 months of implant use. The advantage of longer implant use became more pronounced over time. The previously identified language-facilitating factors of ea
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
Panagos, R. J. (1998) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193259801900609 · Cited by 4,173
The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk
MacWhinney, B. (1992) · Child Language Teaching and Therapy · doi:10.1177/026565909200800211 · Cited by 3,396
Language of Early- and Later-identified Children With Hearing Loss
Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Sedey, A. L., Coulter, D. K., & Mehl, A. L. (1998) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.102.5.1161 · Cited by 2,150
Sharma, A., Dorman, M. F., & Spahr, A. J. (2002) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-200212000-00004 · Cited by 947
Very Early Language Deficits in Dyslexic Children
Scarborough, H. S. (1990) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb03562.x · Cited by 849
A new view of language acquisition
Kuhl, P. K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.22.11850 · Cited by 773
Language Development in Profoundly Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants
Svirsky, M. A., Robbins, A. M., Kirk, K. I., Pisoni, D. B., & Miyamoto, R. T. (2000) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00231 · Cited by 647
Language Skills of Children with Early Cochlear Implantation
Geers, A. E., Nicholas, J. G., & Sedey, A. L. (2003) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000051689.57380.1b · Cited by 637
Self-citationSvirsky, M. A., Teoh, S.-W., & Neuburger, H. (2004) · Audiology and Neurotology · doi:10.1159/000078392 · Cited by 583
Assessing language production in children
Miller, J. F. (1980) · Cited by 419
Cited by
Davidson, L. S., Geers, A. E., & Nicholas, J. G. (2014) · Cochlear Implants International · doi:10.1179/1754762813y.0000000051 · Cited by 79
Self-citationSaeedi, S., Bouraghi, H., Seifpanahi, M.-S., & Ghazisaeedi, M. (2022) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/4814945 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicholas, J. G., & Geers, A. E.
- Venue
- Ear and Hearing
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 286-298
- ISSN
- 0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047802844
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Early Auditory Experience on the Spoken Language of Deaf Children at 3 Years of Age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aud.0000215973.76912.c6
- The paper
- Nicholas, J. G., & Geers, A. E. (2006). Effects of Early Auditory Experience on the Spoken Language of Deaf Children at 3 Years of Age. Ear and Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000215973.76912.c6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.