The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Congenital Auditory Deprivation Reduces Synaptic Activity within the Auditory Cortex in a Layer-specific Manner
Abstract
The present study investigates the functional deficits of naive auditory cortices in adult congenitally deaf cats. For this purpose, their auditory system was stimulated electrically using cochlear implants. Synaptic currents in cortical layers were revealed using current source density analyses. They were compared with synaptic currents found in electrically stimulated hearing cats. The naive auditory cortex showed significant deficits in synaptic activity in infragranular cortical layers. Furthermore, there was also a deficit of synaptic activities at longer latencies (>30 ms). The 'cortical column' was not activated in the well-defined sequence found in normal hearing cats. These results demonstrate functional deficits as a consequence of congenital auditory deprivation. Similar deficits are likely in congenitally deaf children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synaptic Activity and the Construction of Cortical Circuits
Katz, L. C., & Shatz, C. J. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5290.1133 · Cited by 3,048
The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1970) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009022 · Cited by 3,030
Development and plasticity of cortical processing architectures
Singer, W. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5237.758 · Cited by 669
Steriade, M. (1997) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/7.6.583 · Cited by 429
Friauf, E., & Shatz, C. J. (1991) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1991.66.6.2059 · Cited by 198
Cited by
Cross-modal plasticity: where and how?
Bavelier, D., & Neville, H. J. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn848 · Cited by 1,040
Steele, C. J., Bailey, J. A., Zatorre, R. J., & Penhune, V. B. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3578-12.2013 · Cited by 388
Syka, J. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00002.2002 · Cited by 369
Tomblin, J. B., Barker, B. A., Spencer, L. J., Zhang, X., & Gantz, B. J. (2005) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/059 · Cited by 300
Neurophysiological considerations for visual implants
Meikle, S. J., & Wong, Y. T. (2022) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-021-02417-2 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Kral, A., Hartmann, R., Tillein, J., Heid, S., & Klinke, R.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-07-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 714-726
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2111229801
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Congenital Auditory Deprivation Reduces Synaptic Activity within the Auditory Cortex in a Layer-specific Manner. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/10.7.714
- The paper
- Kral, A., Hartmann, R., Tillein, J., Heid, S., & Klinke, R. (2000). Congenital Auditory Deprivation Reduces Synaptic Activity within the Auditory Cortex in a Layer-specific Manner. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.7.714
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
