Cited by 16Burn Injury Management and OutcomesClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyBody Composition Measurement Techniques

Comparison of the Metabolic Response to Burn Injury in Obese and Nonobese Patients

Ireton-Jones, Carol·1997·Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation

Abstract

Burned patients who are obese encounter many obstacles to recovery associated with their excess weight. Weight is used as a factor in most equations designed to estimate energy expenditure, whereas measurement of energy expenditure provides an objective assessment of energy expenditure. In this study 15 obese and 15 nonobese burned patients had their energy expenditures measured with indirect calorimetry (MEE) and compared with energy expenditures predicted with the Harris-Benedict equation (HBEE) to assess the magnitude of hypermetabolism associated with burn injury. There were no significant differences between the obese and nonobese patients in height or burn size. ME, HBEE, and weight were significantly greater in the obese versus the nonobese patients (p < 0.05). The degree of hypermetabolism (MEE/HBEE) in the obese patients was not significantly different from that of the nonobese patients. Obese burned patients have an increase in metabolic rate (energy expenditure) similar to that of nonobese burned patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004630-199701000-00015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of 395 inpatients referred for nutritional support, no single prediction equation was accurate (within 90-110% of measured REE) in the majority of the population.

    “In this study the authors concluded that no single prediction equation was accurate (i.e.within 90e110% of measured REE) in the majority of the population.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ireton-Jones, C.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ireton-Jones, Carol
Venue
Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation
Published
1997-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
81-85
ISSN
0273-8481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068704903
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
burns, obesity, energy expenditure, hypermetabolism, indirect calorimetry, Harris-Benedict equation, metabolic rate
MeSH terms
Adult, Burns, Calorimetry, Indirect, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review