Latency of the Auditory Evoked Neuromagnetic Field Components: Stimulus Dependence and Insights Toward Perception
Abstract
This review will focus on investigations of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field component, the M100, detectable in the magnetoencephalogram recorded during presentation of auditory stimuli, approximately 100 milliseconds after stimulus onset. In particular, the dependence of M100 latency on attributes of the stimulus, such as intensity, pitch and timbre will be discussed, along with evidence relating M100 latency observations to perceptual features of the stimuli. Comparison with investigation of the analogous electrical potential component, the N1, will be made. Parametric development of stimuli from pure tones through complex tones to speech elements will be made, allowing the influence of spectral pitch, virtual pitch and perceptual categorization to be delineated and suggesting implications for the role of such latency observations in the study of speech processing. The final section will deal with potential clinical applications offered by M100 latency measurements, as objective indices of normal and abnormal cortical processing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The auditory M100 is a strong, reliable response occurring about 100 ms after sound onset.
“The auditory M100 is a prominent and robust response, observed around 100 ms after auditory stimulus onset and has been a widely investigated auditory MEG response (for review see Roberts et al., 2000).”
From Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models (2010) · cites this paper as Roberts et al., 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models
Tian, X. (2010) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00166 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
“The auditory M100 is a prominent and robust response, observed around 100 ms after auditory stimulus onset and has been a widely investigated auditory MEG response (for review see Roberts et al., 2000).”
Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus
Krumbholz, K. (2003) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/13.7.765 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Maturation of auditory neural processes in autism spectrum disorder — A longitudinal MEG study
Port, R. G., Edgar, J. C., Ku, M., Bloy, L., Murray, R., Blaskey, L., Levy, S. E., & Roberts, T. P. L. (2016) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2016.03.021 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Roberts, T. P. L., Ferrari, P., Stufflebeam, S. M., & Poeppel, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roberts, Timothy P.L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 114-129
- ISSN
- 0736-0258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070379741
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- M100, stimulus dependence, auditory perception, N1, pure tones, complex tones, speech processing, virtual pitch, perceptual categorization, cortical auditory processing, clinical application
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Atrophy, Basal Ganglia, Brain, Brain Diseases, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Phonetics, Psychophysics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Speech Perception, Temporal Lobe, Time Factors, Magnetoencephalography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review