Cited by 211Sport Psychology and PerformanceMotor Control and AdaptationEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electroencephalographic Studies of Skilled Psychomotor Performance

Hatfield, Bradley D., Haufler, Amy J., Hung, Tsung-Min, Spalding, Thomas W.·2004·Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Measurements based on the EEG have featured prominently in shaping present-day concepts of the neurocognitive aspects of skilled performance. The techniques include measurements of spectral power, interelectrode coherence, event-related potential components such as the P300, slow potentials, and the method of cognitive inference. The advantages offered by EEG-based approaches lies in their spatiotemporal resolution (potentially 1 mm and less than 1 millisecond, respectively) and the potential to preserve ecological validity, i.e., to obtain measurements of cortical function under the same conditions that the task is normally performed. These studies indicate that activity is reduced in specific regions of the cerebral cortex of experts relative to that observed in novices. These changes occur over time as a result of practice. The authors argue that such cortical change results in less attentional demand and less cognitive interference with motor planning and execution. The findings attest to the plasticity of the central nervous system when one is engaged in goal-directed learning, and hold implications for understanding how the nervous system acquires voluntary skills, whether in the context of the training of an athlete or the rehabilitation of a patient who has lost motor skills due to a disease of the nervous system.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004691-200405000-00003

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bird, 1987, Int J Sport Psychol, 18, 9
  2. Hatfield, 1982, Am Marksman, 7, 6
  3. Janelle, 2000b, Int J Sports Vis, 6, 21
  4. Konttinen, 1992, Int J Sport Psychol, 23, 110
  5. Landers, 1994, Int J Sport Psychol, 25, 313
  6. Radlo, 2002, International Journal of Sport Psychology, 33, 205

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hatfield, B. D., Haufler, A. J., Hung, T.-M., & Spalding, T. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • McDaniel College (US)
  • University of Taipei (TW)
  • California State Polytechnic University (US)
Corresponding author
Hatfield, Bradley D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Published
2004-05
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
144-156
ISSN
0736-0258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080191065
Cited by
211
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
expert-novice differences, motor learning, cortical plasticity, EEG spectral power, P300, slow potentials, cognitive inference, attentional demands, motor planning
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Humans, Psychomotor Performance, Sports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review