Cited by 31Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A comparison of the neuropsychological profiles of the DSM-IV subtypes of ADHD.

G, C L·2002·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

G, C L Editor(s): TEPLIN, STUART W. M.D., Editor; GRUS, CATHERINE L. Ph.D.; SANDLER, ADRIAN D. M.D.; REIFF, MICHAEL I. M.D. Author Information

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004703-200204000-00015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 31

Metadata

Authors
G, C. L.
Corresponding author
G, C L
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2002-04
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
120
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4248607272
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, neuropsychological profile, executive function, cognitive impairment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review